Sepia 56 Polaroid & A 545 Back

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 13
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 3
  • 0
  • 40
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 41
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 33
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 37

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,899
Messages
2,782,716
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
0

SuzanneR

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
5,977
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Multi Format
I have attached an image I made today of some flowers for a valentine card project that I am donating a few cards for. I decided to use my 4x5 camera, and Polaroid type 56 (Sepia) which is what I happen to have on hand.

My question... I consistently had the upper right corner not be full developed. Is this an issue with the polaroid material itself, or the 545 back?

Your help is appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • polaflower.jpg
    polaflower.jpg
    41.5 KB · Views: 131

bennoj

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
98
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
Multi Format
I have 2 545 backs and one of them is much more finicky than the other when it comes to spreading the developer evenly over the image area. If I don't pull perfectly straight out with a smooth motion the leading right corner of the image (looks to be the same corner as yours) is undeveloped (how much depends on just how far off a straight line I'm pulling. I'm sure that the problem is the rollers needing adjustment and I just haven't gotten around to doing it.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,533
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
that has happened to me in the past and I concluded that it was because I stored the film on the side, causing the goo to settle to one side and then spread less evenly.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
suzanne

this happens to me with 59 film as well.
i use both a 545 and 500 back. while
the 500 back seems to spread the pod more evenly
it still does that strange corner-thingy.

john
 

dmcmahon

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2005
Messages
20
Location
Minneapolis,
Format
4x5 Format
I have found that a slow steady pull is better than a quick jerk. If you take it easy with the pulling motion I have found that you get better more consistent results. That's my experience anyway.

david
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,468
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Sometimes it's easier to get a smooth pull if you take the back out of the camera first, assuming you aren't doing that already. It would also make it easy to experiment with different orientations when you pull it through the rollers.

barry
 

Alex Hawley

Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2003
Messages
2,892
Location
Kansas, USA
Format
Large Format
It can also happen when separating the two sheets. Slow steady pull, a little care in separating. Have fun Suzanne and enjoy the lovely little prints!
 
OP
OP
SuzanneR

SuzanneR

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
5,977
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Multi Format
Thanks everyone... I take the back out of the camera before I pull the film. Maybe just a bit more practice getting "the feel" for pulling it out of the back, and peeling them apart. It was fun to make these, and despite the flaw, I can still use them for some cards.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom