Sensitometers...might want to get one soon...

Brown crested nuthatch

A
Brown crested nuthatch

  • 0
  • 0
  • 15
Double Self-Portrait

A
Double Self-Portrait

  • 7
  • 2
  • 119
IMG_0728l.jpg

D
IMG_0728l.jpg

  • 7
  • 1
  • 88
Metalwork still life

A
Metalwork still life

  • 9
  • 3
  • 122

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,705
Messages
2,779,555
Members
99,683
Latest member
sharknetworks
Recent bookmarks
0

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,542
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I think many on this forum have experienced waxing and waning of interest in darkroom equipment. For example, my experience is the golden age of free and inexpensive darkroom equipment is already past. Just try to find a nice large format enlarger these days. It is getting harder and harder.

However, sensitometers are still available, but the availability is nearing the tail of availability. The availability is from the somewhat recent dump of analog equipment that occurred when Breast Mammography (the last radiographic holdout of FILM) finally went digital to join most of the other radiographic studies.

Why want one? In the past, analysis of film was time consuming, math intensive, and required expertise and information not commonly available to the average darkroom worker. However, today, forums like this and the internet in general, make all the research on film testing available from the comfort of one's home. Also, the availability of computers makes analysis of film data retrieved from the sensitometer almost trivial compared to the hours and years spent in the past.

For example I recently got some Shanghai 8x10 film. It only took a few moments to expose a strip in the sensitometert (hardest part was cutting an even strip to fit a 35mm film reel for processing), process the strip, dry with a blow dryer and read the values with a densitometer. The most challenging part was entering the data to my computer software with the goofy new keyboard that came with the new iMac I'm typing on now (no extra number keypad :sad:) Almost instantly the software graphed the data and gave me a relative speed (compared to a fresh name-brand film) and gamma and almost as important, showed me the shape of the H&D curve. Way easier than trying to calibrate a monitor and color printer for the 'other system' of image reproduction.

By natural progression, other imaging modalities then adopted the digital technology. The transition from conventional mammography to its digital counterpart, however, was delayed due to the difficulty of producing a full-field digital detector

Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2008 Oct-Dec; 4(4): e31.
Published online 2008 Oct 1. doi: 10.2349/biij.4.4.e31
PMCID: PMC3097746
PMID: 21611016
Digital versus screen film mammography: a clinical comparison
Y Faridah, MBBS, MRad
 
Last edited:

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,671
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Worth thinking about, makes a lot sense for those of you that use 8X10, even 4X5, when I did a speed test with Forma 400 4X5 used 35mm for a ring around. but a sensitomerers or densitomer is more percise.
 

bnxvs

Member
Joined
May 6, 2017
Messages
232
Location
Astana, Kazakhstan
Format
Multi Format
... It only took a few moments to expose a strip in the sensitometert (hardest part was cutting an even strip to fit a 35mm film reel for processing), process the strip, dry with a blow dryer and read the values with a densitometer. The most challenging part was entering the data to my computer software with the goofy new keyboard that came with the new iMac I'm typing on now (no extra number keypad :sad:) Almost instantly the software graphed the data and gave me a relative speed (compared to a fresh name-brand film) and gamma and almost as important, showed me the shape of the H&D curve. Way easier than trying to calibrate a monitor and color printer for the 'other system' of image reproduction.
+100 :smile:
 

mjork

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 20, 2015
Messages
103
Location
MA, USA
Format
Multi Format
I looked on eBay and only see sensitometers designed for blue and/or green sensitive x-ray film. That doesn't seem useful for pan-chromatic film? Can you point me to any example device that has a daylight balanced light source?
 
OP
OP
ic-racer

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,542
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I looked on eBay and only see sensitometers designed for blue and/or green sensitive x-ray film. That doesn't seem useful for pan-chromatic film? Can you point me to any example device that has a daylight balanced light source?
Color of light source does not change the film's ability to respond to changes in development. Most panchromatic films for which spectral sensitivity is reported have similar same sensitivity to green, blue or red. You can see in the composite below.
Spectral Sensitivity Composite2.jpg

Results2.jpg

Speed Results.jpg
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
ic-racer

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,542
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Having reported that, I don't see why the LEDS in a Green or Blue sensitometer could not be swapped for white if it would make one sleep better. It may be an interesting project (though maybe not needed if only comparing films of similar spectral sensitivity)

Sensitometer Insides.JPG
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom