I would like to gain better exposure control in Cyanotypes but dont have a step wedge at the moment. So I want to know if the "Double the exposure equals a one stop increase" rule work in Cyanotypes.
Thanks for the reply. I was refering to the Cyanotype exposure (UV light) which is a contact print process, so no aperture available. I just wondered if the chemicals responded reciprocally like the Silver processes do, and whether there is a heel /shoulder as well.
Thanks for the reply. I was refering to the Cyanotype exposure (UV light) which is a contact print process, so no aperture available. I just wondered if the chemicals responded reciprocally like the Silver processes do, and whether there is a heel /shoulder as well.
Attached is an image file showing a cyanotype compared to a palladium curve. This curve should give you some idea of what to expect in printing cyanotype, especially as that regards the toe and the shoulder of the curve.
Yes, I used Davis' Winplotter program for the plot. The step wedge prints were made on COT 320 and the densities read with an X-Rite 810. I read the reflection density of the cyanotype with Red channel, and that of the palladium print with Blue channel, which I find gives a better indication of the actual depth of shadow density as seen by the eye than the Visual mode. 100% of Dmax when read this was was about 1.5 for both processes.
No plans for now but I would like to do so, assuming of course that we can get past the language problem. If you know of any organization that organizes and holds workshops of this type I woud appreciate it if you would put me in touch.