I did a test last weekend with a hassy.
(A) First roll developed 'normal' as I do it always.
pyrocat-HD 1:1:100, 20 degree celcius. for 12 minutes.
first min continious, after that 1x each 30 seconds.
Second roll.
(B) pyrocat-HD 1:1:100, 22 degree celcius. for 15 minutes
first min continious, after that 10 seconds at 4,8 and 12 minutes.
Conclusion (prints are 24cm x 24cm):
------------------------------------
Both prints are printed at their best. Print (A) is printed at grade 2.5. Print (B) at grade 2. (A) is a little softer.
-General impression of both prints from 1 meter is equal.
-Shadow separation is equal
-middle tone separation in the tree looks a little brighter for (B). But is almost unnoticable. Maybe i want to see something here...
So for me the method used for roll B is not different than the one I use with much more agitation.
Remark:
--------
I would have expected that the max density of the negative (clouds) would be somethat less dense because of the decreese in agitation, but it looks that with the 1:1 dilution there is enough developer to overcome the 4 minutes between two agitation points.