Second sharpest after Mamiya 7?

hankchinaski

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
157
Location
Glasgow
Format
Medium Format
In term of sharpness only, what system (or individual lens) comes after the Mamiya 7?
As far as personal experience goes, I will cite the Rollei Apo-Symmar 90mm Makro.
 
OP
OP

hankchinaski

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2022
Messages
157
Location
Glasgow
Format
Medium Format
Do you mean that Mamiya 7 is the sharpest?

They do:


 

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
2,994
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
Mamiya 6 is as sharp as Mamiya 7. Also Bronica RF645 in my opinion is just as sharp as both of them. I was actually just staring at negatives from all three systems last evening under a loop. Can’t tell a difference.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,499
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
In term of sharpness only, what system (or individual lens) comes after the Mamiya 7?
As far as personal experience goes, I will cite the Rollei Apo-Symmar 90mm Makro.

Where did you find the MTF or test results on the Mamiya 7 lens?

Sure the 90mm is very sharp in the center, but if one were to want the corners sharp, the 120 Makro Apogon might be better.

 

Philippe-Georges

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,659
Location
Flanders Fields
Format
Medium Format
According to Henri Cartier-Bresson: "sharpness is a bourgeois concept..." (but he himself was a descendant of a very bourgeois family).
 

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
636
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format

Klaus_H

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2006
Messages
113
Location
Lower Saxony
Format
Medium Format
In many cases the sharpness of a photo is influenced more by the use of a tripod than by the optical quality of the lens.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,540
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Also...I read somewhere that MF lenses have generally less resolving power than 135 lenses - is it also the case for large format lenses?

I have not read that, but seems to me that a good design will have the same resolving power across formats. On the other hand the larger the format the less resolving power becomes an issue, size does matter.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,540
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
As important as the is lens is which film. If you shoot Tmax 400 a lens needs to resolve 125LPMM, Tmax 100 then 200 LPMM, my Kowa and Mamiya lens will resolve 200 LPMM while my Kodak Tourist I doubt will resolve more than 125 or so. TriX, Foma Action HP5 and other traditionally grain films will resolve less.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,499
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
In many cases the sharpness of a photo is influenced more by the use of a tripod than by the optical quality of the lens.

Exactly and confounding factor is the Mamiya is billed as a hand-held camera. Of course it does have a tripod socket, and flash photography is an area where hand-held cameras can excel in sharpness.

Looking at the MTF posted above in #7 (thank you!) the 80mm looks good. But of course, they are all going to work fine.

I have eight lenses of the Rolleiflex 6008 system (not the 90, however) but I had my Rolleicord with it's Xenar and a tripod the other day to take this:

 
Last edited:

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,232
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
I have had my Rolleicord Va for over 40 years- the results I get from the Xenar impress me every time I use it. Of course this does not address the OP’s subject directly, but I must say none of the MF optics I have used (Hasselblad, Rollei, Kowa, Bronica, Mamiya) have felt wanting for sharpness.
 

warden

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
2,957
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Medium Format

Ditto. Unless you print large there are many MF lenses that are plenty sharp enough.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…