Seagull 107

Roses

A
Roses

  • 1
  • 0
  • 40
Rebel

A
Rebel

  • 3
  • 1
  • 52
Watch That First Step

A
Watch That First Step

  • 1
  • 0
  • 49
Barn Curves

A
Barn Curves

  • 2
  • 1
  • 41
Columbus Architectural Detail

A
Columbus Architectural Detail

  • 4
  • 2
  • 45

Forum statistics

Threads
197,487
Messages
2,759,827
Members
99,515
Latest member
falc
Recent bookmarks
0

Ed_Davor

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
252
Format
Multi Format
After some time of thinking and rethinking, I think I'm going to enter MF through a very small door with this camera.

I know, I know, don't buy it, buy a Yashica-mat,
but from what I've read the sicret lies in a few repairs: recalibrating the focus, avoiding changing the shutter speed after cocking the shutter, relieving some pressure of the pressure plate etc. Which pretty much covers all its inherent technical flaws which made many people throw them away after a year (even after a jamed shutter)

Well anyway, the reviews on the 4-element lens are really good

Now what I want to ask you people is this:

I've found a nice little review which features a sample picture and a crop made on a Flextight 646 (it doesn't get better as a test) of a frame of Velvia 50, but I'm not good at evaluating MF images, so I ask someone to comment on the crop, is it good enough for MF?
The page is in russian so I don't understand a thing

http://www.mformat.com/camera.asp?mv=7&mf=97

here it is, the crop is taken from the above picture, it seems like a pretty tight crop, my guts tell me this is good sharpness for that kind of enlargement, but I could be wrong
 
OP
OP

Ed_Davor

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
252
Format
Multi Format
hope this helps:

after some resizing in photoshop and trying to match the two pixtures, the crop seems to be such that the entire image would be about 7Kx7K pixels large.
 

Foto Ludens

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2004
Messages
1,121
Format
Multi Format
Yup, its good. I don't expect you to ever enlarge a neg/slide that much, anyway. I've shot with a 3 element Seagull before and have been pleased with the results, so I expect that a 4 element one will meet your expectations.
 
OP
OP

Ed_Davor

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
252
Format
Multi Format
IT seems this is 3200dpi. If this were 35mm, that wouldn't be a very good sharpness at 3200dpi, but as I understand you can't evaualte MF the same way you'd evaluate 35mm at the same dpi resolution, right?
 

Foto Ludens

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2004
Messages
1,121
Format
Multi Format
Right.

The best way to test the camera out, I think, would be to loan one and shoot a roll through it.

Here's an example of a 3 element Seagull. This was Tri-x in d-76...

auto_fence.jpg


Like I said, the 4 element lens would only be better. I've almost bought one a few times, but ended up with SLRs instead.

Hope this helps,

André
 

DBP

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2006
Messages
1,906
Location
Alexandria,
Format
Multi Format
If you want an even smaller door, buy an old CiroFlex for around $25. The triplet on the A-E models is pretty good.
 
OP
OP

Ed_Davor

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
252
Format
Multi Format
I do not want a small door intentionally, but as big as I can affoard (which is small right now)
 
OP
OP

Ed_Davor

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
252
Format
Multi Format
What I'd really like to hear is a comment on that crop from someone using pro MF gear

What I'd like to know, is wheather there is a big difference in sharpness between this examples and something you'd get from a "serious" MF lenses such as new Mamiya or Zeiss lenses at 3200dpi.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom