Scratched Negatives Expectations?

Tomato

A
Tomato

  • 2
  • 0
  • 13
Cool

A
Cool

  • 3
  • 0
  • 28
Coquitlam River BC

D
Coquitlam River BC

  • 3
  • 0
  • 36
Mayday celebrations

A
Mayday celebrations

  • 2
  • 2
  • 81
MayDay celebration

A
MayDay celebration

  • 2
  • 0
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,563
Messages
2,761,107
Members
99,404
Latest member
ManfrediFilm
Recent bookmarks
0

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
When you get negatives back from a lab, what are you expectations regarding scratches? Do you expect/demand none? Or do you have some level of acceptance that scratches happen?

I want to keep my expectations in line with what is reasonable.

Thanks,
 

batwister

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
913
Location
Midlands, UK
Format
Medium Format
I've had one scratch on a slide in the last four years of using my lab. It was scanned however. This is the only time I can imagine negatives getting scratched because of the extra handling.
 

winger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 13, 2005
Messages
3,975
Location
southwest PA
Format
Multi Format
Since I can process and print from my negs without scratching them, I expect someone getting paid to handle others' film to not scratch it either. Ditto for dust, though I find that more difficult to avoid on my own (my darkroom is also the laundry room and we have 4 dogs).
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,708
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
I expect the lab to take reasonable care of my film while in their possession. I have never had film scratched by professional labs, but it has happened at lower cost places.

You might consider doing your own film processing too.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,990
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Maybe this is a stupid question, but how do you tell if the lab scratched the film, or it was done in camera?

Scratches done in camera have a very distinct appearance.

And generally you will be able to see them on undeveloped film, so if you are suspicious about the camera, it is worthwhile wasting a bit of film to check.

And that certainly is not a stupid question!
 

PKM-25

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,980
Location
Enroute
Format
Multi Format
And how is this topic and the other one you titled something like first film shot in 10 years....."Industry News"?
 

Chris Lange

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
770
Location
NY
Format
Multi Format
I'll quote an earlier post I made about the praise being rained down on Richard Photo (who, while I'm sure they are a good lab, are simply doing what any good lab -should- be doing)

If I get film back with scratches, dried in dust, or other blemishes, it seriously compromises my faith in that lab's ability to meet my standards. I understand that errors occur from time to time, but I will not accept them. My father used to send volumes of chrome to Duggal every month (on the order of 600-900 rolls) when he was photographing full time, for 15 years and I have never heard him tell any horror stories. When he switched to ColorEdge (now CRC) for color negative processing, sending the same amount of film, it was the same case.

It's a lab's job to give you professional results.

A certain quote from The Rock comes to mind.

"Your best? Losers "try their best". Winners go home and f**k the prom queen.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom