Intro to Digital is an entry-level class. So, none.How many of them completed their DEGREE (your first question) in photography? How many even completed two semesters?
I was mentored by my dad (a photographer and photography teacher), then continued learning through experience, experimenting, reading, working, basically taking pictures. I never intended to become a full time professional, so it was always hobby driven. I think an apprentice type system would be ideal for photography; though formal education also works. As I have mentioned in other threads my dad went through Clarence A. Bach's Fremont High (Los Angeles)) photography vocational program in the 1940s. This was a unique program and model to study.
Most of the successful photographers I know come from business families. The moves, the attitude are more integral allowing the rest to get more focus.
i realize there is always more to understand because im scratching the surface.
enjoy your coffee
RIT?[/QUOTE
Yes, if one wants to bet on an employer that would value an RIT degree. What employer would value an RIT degree in photography?
It is not an either/or proposition? Generally, if education is pursued, it is followed by trial by fire.School or trial by fire?
RIT is a great school!!!RIT?
It is not an either/or proposition? Generally, if education is pursued, it is followed by trial by fire.
I am currently taking the Studio Lighting I course at my local community college. I am not saying I couldn't learn it on my own, but learning it is a structured environment with all of the equipment at hand, and an instructor to guide me, is definitely a benefit.
Serious question: Does anybody here know any "successful" photographer who owes any part of her/his success to school? Brooks turned into a scam and failed years ago.
That's a pretty tough demand. The best photo schools are not exclusively photo schools, but part of a larger institution. Most major art schools have pretty-good to excellent photo programs. A lot of community colleges have good vocational photo departments, but they usually don't venture into the art photo arena. There really is no great demand for an exclusively photo school now that would turn out graduates that could jump right into the professional market, as screwed-up as it is today.Serious question: Does anybody here know any "successful" photographer who owes any part of her/his success to school? Brooks turned into a scam and failed years ago. What does that tell us about the utility of a "school" for basics/fundamentals?
A REAL photo school would be recognized as a photo school. Name one.
If it's not recognized as a photo school (can you name one?), someone wanting to pursue a photo career (for some reason) is better off as a volunteer assistant in a place like NYC or LA, or studying something that might arguably contribute to aesthetic/art thinking or marketing skills (which refers back to Internet and video)....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?