• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Scanning 35mm half frame negatives

Horicon Marsh-4

A
Horicon Marsh-4

  • 1
  • 0
  • 32
ptloboscarmelEIR3.jpg

A
ptloboscarmelEIR3.jpg

  • jhw
  • Dec 15, 2025
  • 1
  • 0
  • 44

Forum statistics

Threads
201,214
Messages
2,820,580
Members
100,589
Latest member
rando
Recent bookmarks
1

julio1fer

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
24
Location
Montevideo,
Format
35mm
I own two scanners, Epson V600 and Pacific Image XE super. Both may be used for 35mm half frame negatives.

However, the standard film holder is not too practical in the PI (one has to keep adjusting the negative strip position, because the plastic frames eventually superpose with a film frame). Resolution is not that great in the Epson for that small frame size, although the Epson holder has no plastic frames and is more convenient.

Does anyone know of film holders to recommend for scanning 35mm half frame in the Pacific Image XE super?

Thanks for any advice!
 

loccdor

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
2,386
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
That sounds like a frame spacing irregularity that could also cause issues if you were scanning full frames. Couldn't you remove the cross-members from the Pacific Image holder? That would potentially reduce the film flatness, though.
 

FriedLouisStudio

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 11, 2023
Messages
192
Location
Hudson Valley, NY
Format
35mm
I didn't like the 35mm plastic holders that came with my HP scanner even for full-frame use, and they were really bad for half-frame negs. When scanning transparencies, the scanner's (automatically set and not manually controllable) focus point is set a tiny fraction above the glass for a mounted slide. Getting negatives to that exact height isn't easy; just laying the negative strips right on the glass results in soft images.

I made a crude cardboard mask - just two thin pieces with a cutout for a five-frame strip (or nine half fames) sandwiched together with a piece of tape on one long side. The cut is just tall enough to mask the sprocket holes. It's not an ideal solution - with no cross-pieces, film curl is a problem, so I generally let my negatives flatten under weight for a couple of days before scanning. And I'm not skilled enough to have made the mask with a perfect right angle so I could simply butt it up against the edge of the scanner glass for correct horizontal orientation, so getting negatives perfectly aligned to the horizon can be tricky.

A crude jury rig? Yes. But with careful fiddling, it works okay a lot of the time. Here are examples, 2400dpi scans of Double-X negs from my Pen F and Pen S:

icedfallsDouble-X.jpgamarylisDouble-X2.jpgeagleDouble-X.jpgSchoolMtnRdTrailBridgePenS.jpg
 
OP
OP

julio1fer

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 5, 2008
Messages
24
Location
Montevideo,
Format
35mm
Your scans look quite good! Is that a flatbed scanner?

Maybe I should 3D-print a custom holder for the Pacific Image. The standard holder clicks into position for each of the 6 full-frame negatives in the strip. However the scanner works if one positions the holder in between clicks.

As said above any irregularities in film spacing causes the cross members to intrude in a frame.

If I can make a holder with no cross-members and no clicked positions, it should be practical.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom