Scanner for B&W negatives

Coffee Shop

Coffee Shop

  • 1
  • 0
  • 193
Lots of Rope

H
Lots of Rope

  • 0
  • 0
  • 284
Where Bach played

D
Where Bach played

  • 4
  • 2
  • 632
Love Shack

Love Shack

  • 3
  • 2
  • 1K
Matthew

A
Matthew

  • 5
  • 3
  • 2K

Forum statistics

Threads
199,809
Messages
2,796,916
Members
100,042
Latest member
wturner9
Recent bookmarks
2

Markk9

Member
Joined
May 15, 2005
Messages
4
Location
Northeastern
Format
35mm
Im a film shooter 35mm, no plans to go to a larger format. Ive been shooting color negatives for a long time. Im just starting to get into B&W, so far Ive been having my local pro-lab processing and scanning the negatives for me. I want to start processing my B&W at home and scanning them myself. After the holidays Im going to purchase a film scanner. Ive been looking at the Coolscan IV and OpticFilm 7500i. From what I can find in the reviews the 7500i is the best bang for the buck. My questions is how well do these two scanner do with black and white negatives?

Mark
 

Pinholemaster

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2005
Messages
1,566
Location
Westminster,
Format
8x10 Format
B&W

The Nikon can scan B&W, but can't speak for the OpticFilm 7500i.

But here's the deal, it is better to scan B&W was a monochrome color negative. You'll get more information out of the neg. Then in Photoshop you convert the image to grayscale after making all your corrections.

All the B&W images on my web site were made this way: Dead Link Removed

If you can swing it, I recommend the Nikon 5000 scanner instead.
 

bobwysiwyg

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
1,627
Location
Ann Arbor, M
Format
Multi Format
I'm fairly new to this forum and though I searched, couldn't really find an answer so thought this might be the most likely place to stick this inquiry.

I shoot both film and digital. Recently returned to film, both 35mm and 4x5 (just learning the latter). On the 35mm side, I am currently limited to using an older Epson 2450 to scan negatives and it seems to do a credible job. I use an Epson R280 for printing. Now I know neither of these is optimal, but that's OK for now.

I have a basic question about scanning negatives, particularly the 35mm. At what selected DPI would scanning be best to get the most out of the negative for printing say up to 8x10 as a print output size? Seems like there is some threshold beyond which I'm just wasting scan time and file size considering printer limitations. Thanks in advance for putting up with a newbie question like this.
 

Masterview

Member
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
22
The basic way of figuring out the necessary scan resolution is to divide the length of the print by the length of the film, so:

10 inches / 1.5 inches = 6.66

Then multiply this by the print resolution, which is typically 300dpi, though some people insist Epson uses 360dpi. Assuming 300dpi:

300 x 6.66 = 2000dpi scanning resolution.

Make sure your scanner can go that high. Most flatbed scanners top out at a lower resolution than what the manufacturer states. I believe there are a couple threads on that topic.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom