• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Same vintage lenses for film vs digital.

I recently bought a AI-S lens, I am wondering if after the 180 day KEH warranty is over, it I should chip it [add aNikon AF Dandelion Chip not hit it with a hammer] to make it easier to use with the Nikon AF cameras, or should I leave it alone?
 
Last edited:
I recently bought a AI-S lens, I am wondering if after the 180 day KEH warranty is over, it I should chip it [add aNikon AF Dandelion Chip not hit it with a hammer] to make it easier to use with the Nikon AF cameras, or should I leave it alone.

 

That’s my point, film enables a vintage lens to shine whilst digital makes the same lens to distort …!
 
That’s my point, film enables a vintage lens to shine whilst digital makes the same lens to distort …!

That is not what I said at all.

First, "distortion" has a meaning in optics, geometric distortion like barrel vs pincushion, and that's no different between film and digital sensors.

Next, many "vintage" lenses work perfectly well on digital sensors, and the examples where the combo is a problem are likely edge cases like non-retrofocus rangefinder lenses on mirrorless cameras. Mainly, I think, digital detectors enable a level of pixel-peeping that was harder to do in the film era. There is a lot of cork-sniffing dialogue on the internet about supposed differences between different vintages, brands, designs of lenses. Apart from some basic stuff like the effects of residual spherical aberration on bokeh, most of the cork-sniffing is based on optics myths, not optics facts. Try to tune it out and make some pictures.