Salt water to wash film?

Waldsterben

D
Waldsterben

  • 0
  • 0
  • 450
Microbus

H
Microbus

  • 3
  • 1
  • 2K
Release the Bats

A
Release the Bats

  • 12
  • 0
  • 1K
Sonatas XII-47 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-47 (Life)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 2K
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 8
  • 0
  • 3K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,670
Messages
2,795,179
Members
99,995
Latest member
mackaydavid
Recent bookmarks
0

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,794
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Now, I'm no chemist (passed high school chemistry by the skin of my teeth), but my understanding of these passages is that FB prints will, without a dedicated 'hypo eliminator,' retain some thiosulfate no matter what. Is that right?

Next to that, would it be correct to assume that a bath of sodium sulfite or even plain old sodium bicarbonate would serve as extremely potent wash aids? Does anybody happen to know the effectiveness of the current commercial products relative to tap water?

1) From what I've read, and what PE has said, yes, there will be residual thiosulfates when only a wash aid/hypo clear is used, but archival processing science suggests that this might not be such a bad thing. Hypo eliminators are not much favoured these days.

2) Yes, a bath of sodium sulfite or bicarbonate is a better way to clear thiosulfates than plain tap water. Of course, that is only important when you use FB paper. With film or RC, the emulsion washes off pretty quickly, and the base does not retain thio. It is always important to use fresh fixer if you want to avoid too much thio buildup in all products (ergo longer washing times).

3) If you get the MSDS for commercial products, you will find the % of components. I suppose you might approximate their relative strength compared to tap water by using the data I have posted, but personally I just trust the manufacturer's recommendations, and if I am selling prints I would confirm their sayings with a residual hypo test solution.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,836
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Hypo eliminator is not all the same thing as a wash aid or hypo clearing bath. As I recall the Kodak version was amonina and hydrogen peroxide, it did not reduce wash time but eliminated hypo attached to paper fibers. As already mentioned the use of hypo eliminator was discouraged in the 70's as it the total elimination of hypo may not aid in archival process. I used the Kodak formula in the 60s, my prints from this period seem to have not suffered any ill effects, but who knows in a 100 years?
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,836
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for the link, very helpful. I dont know if rewashing my old prints will undo any of the effects of hypo eliminator I used in the 60s, the prints are now 40+ years old.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom