DavidClapp
Member
Just a quick question - I recently bought an RZ67 Pro II with a 110mm lens and I am considering the 140mm Macro for spring flowers of varying sizes. Seeing as the RZ is a bellows camera and can close focus closely with the 110mm, is the140mm's advantage the floating element correction for a flat focal plane, more rather than it's closer focusing abilities?
Considering most of my macro work is at wider apertures, I was wondering whether I would be wasting my money. I use a 55mm lens on my C330f to great effect (for example) as a macro lens and I wondered if the RZ 65mm might be a better alternative as I hear it can apparently close focus to 5cm?
Thanks in advance for any answers.
Considering most of my macro work is at wider apertures, I was wondering whether I would be wasting my money. I use a 55mm lens on my C330f to great effect (for example) as a macro lens and I wondered if the RZ 65mm might be a better alternative as I hear it can apparently close focus to 5cm?
Thanks in advance for any answers.