I use one minute of stop and five to seven for rapid fix with rotary.
Do you have the Jobo manual? Lots of information in there. Probably available on line too.
I use one minute minimum for the times because that is the smallest increment on my timer.
I know that the rule of thumb when converting development times from inversion agitation to rotary agitation is to reduce the time by 10-15%. But I've searched and haven't read anything about the stop bath and fixer times for rotary processing.
Is it safe to assume that they remain the same as for inversion agitation except agitated continuously? i.e. if using Ilford Ilfostop, for example, one would rotate the tank continuously for 10 seconds before pouring it out? And if the fix time is 5 mins for inversion agitation, then it'll require 5 mins of continuous rotary agitation?
I use one minute for Kodak stop bath and a Beseler rotating agitator, because that gives me enough time to easily fill the measuring graduate with the first batch of fixer.
You probably can't do it for too long. Ten seconds is quite short, if you are trying to be consistent.
And for fixer, this is how I handle the issue: https://www.photrio.com/forum/resou...ixing-procedure-for-black-white-negatives.75/
Kodak and Ilford have clear instructions.
My question was specifically about rotary processing and the effect (if any) on stop bath/fixing times.
I had looked at the data sheets for Ilford Ilfostop and Rapid Fixer and there is no mention of rotary processing. The data sheet for Tri-X does talk about it in terms of the development process and adjustment of times, but that's all I found.
It sounds like I can just use the same times for stop bath/fixer that I've been using for inversion processing.
The time reductions are for the developer or first developers for color film only, the stop bath, fixer, and wash times remain the same.
I recall that Unicolor film drums instructions stated to reduce development by 20% and use standard times for stop and fix.
You're good to go.
I use one minute of stop and five to seven for rapid fix with rotary.
Yes and be sure to tell us if rotary processing cures the problemIt sounds like I can just use the same times for stop bath/fixer that I've been using for inversion processing.
Yes and be sure to tell us if rotary processing cures the problem
pentaxuser
My question was specifically about rotary processing and the effect (if any) on stop bath/fixing times.
I had looked at the data sheets for Ilford Ilfostop and Rapid Fixer and there is no mention of rotary processing. The data sheet for Tri-X does talk about it in terms of the development process and adjustment of times, but that's all I found.
It sounds like I can just use the same times for stop bath/fixer that I've been using for inversion processing.
I know that the rule of thumb when converting development times from inversion agitation to rotary agitation is to reduce the time by 10-15%. But I've searched and haven't read anything about the stop bath and fixer times for rotary processing.
Is it safe to assume that they remain the same as for inversion agitation except agitated continuously? i.e. if using Ilford Ilfostop, for example, one would rotate the tank continuously for 10 seconds before pouring it out? And if the fix time is 5 mins for inversion agitation, then it'll require 5 mins of continuous rotary agitation?
Stop bath and fixer times are not reduced for rotary processing.
I don't know that I have seen much difference in the negatives except large area tones (like a sky) are much more even with rotary processing.
I use the same times for rotary as I do for inversion across the board. My normal development time is 7:30, so a 10% reduction would be 6:45, A 45 second difference. There is probably almost that much error in my timing with filling, sealing, uncapping and emptying already. I don't know that I have seen much difference in the negatives except large area tones (like a sky) are much more even with rotary processing.
35mm, 120 and 4"x5" films, color and black & white, develop must better and much more consistency with the Jobo processor. Why do it by hand if you have a processor.
He doesn't have a processor - just the JOBO hand roller accessory.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?