joel dallenbach
Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2007
- Messages
- 40
- Format
- 35mm RF
planars sell for more than xenotars it seems. A guy at the shop, b&h used store in New York City, told me that a lot of people prefer Xenotar for black and white. I bought a funky user 2.8 c from the shop but it didn't work out. Some light leaks, So I returned this camera, but not before I had fallen in love with it. Later that year I bought a 2.8 d, it wasn't the same, in fact, I hated that camera. It's got dropped a couple of times etc. bad vibe on that beast. Recently I'm back to a 2.8 C with xenotar, It's like brand new. Some how it doesn't have the funky vibe that the one from b&h had, but maybe it has more to do with how it doesn't smell like a subway. It's like brand new after a CLA and well, I dig it because it's mint and I kinda love 2.8 c's. Probably the last rolleiflex made before mamiya and 35mm began to knock Rolleiflex out of the market. Made the year b4 the m3 leica. Does anyone agree with the counterman at b&h, that there is a significant advantage to having xenotar for black and white? and that planar is more for collectors and or those who will settle for nothing but the best, the lenses that Hasselblad uses etc,... Planar models tend to be later w/ meters, this is probably the big sell. I want them all!