Great work. Tiresomely snarky verbiage on the site.
Cheryl, this thread has devolved into a fine example of why online communication, sans the body-language and facial cues conveyed during actual conversation, is such a poor substitute for the real thing.
I
was referring to the verbiage on the photographer's site; as I've communicated to you in other venues, I find that too often the ironic/cute/too-cool-for-school bio/statement stuff tries to put the photographer above the work. You've explained to me your POV: that for some types of photography, that
is an important aspect of marketing the work---selling the photographer him-/herself. On this we're coming at it from different directions; no harm, no foul.
Had I done a better job with my quickly-rendered sentence as I've quoted, I'd have better emphasized how much I DO like Mr Smith's work; and my admiration for his unstinting efforts to produce a high-quality product. You couldn't see my facial animation and delight-raised eyebrows as I perused his site!
I couldn't agree more that a comment about his payment methods seems to reveal a scarcity of anything else to offer this discussion. I suppose some would say that only a wire transfer would be tony enough for a real photographer, or perhaps payment in krugerrands. Maybe a letter of credit from The Dutch East India Company or somesuch 16th century relic....
So Cheryl, no offense meant on my end!
