Rodinal (!!)

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,729
Messages
2,780,075
Members
99,694
Latest member
RetroLab
Recent bookmarks
0

brofkand

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
598
Location
North Carolina
Format
Digital
After using D-76 exclusively for about a year and a half, I decided to try some Rodinal.

I have my Mamiya m645 1000s here that I've been meaning to use before my return period with KEH expires to be certain all is in order, and I decided to develop the Arista EDU Ultra 400 in Rodinal instead of D-76. I was nervous since this was my first time with the new camera AND a new developer, but I wanted to see what was up.

Those negatives are perhaps the most beautiful I've ever produced. I looked at them on my light table with an 8x loupe, and they are absolutely stunning. They're sharp, reasonably contrasty, and dense (perfect for an easy print session). Every other time I'd used EDU Ultra 400 I've gotten poor results, be it 35mm or 120.

I don't know if it's the Mamiya or the Rodinal, but those negatives are wonderful. I can't wait until this weekend so I can print them.
 

yanboechat

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2009
Messages
21
Location
Brazil
Format
35mm
I want to try the rodinal as well. Show the pictures. I´m curious to see them
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
10
Location
Spokane, Wa
Format
35mm
What are you rating the Arista EDU Ultra at? From my experience, it has a true speed of just about 200 in most developers.

Anyway, about Rodinal. It's good stuff, cheap and very versatile. Rodinal is surprisingly good at pushing when used correctly. If you ever get a chance, try stand developing TRI-X rated at 2400. Of course, slower films like Pan-F produce astounding resolution with Rodinal. Overall, it's a really nice developer to have around.
 

Martin Reed

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
325
Location
North London
Format
Multi Format
It's amazing stuff, and the keeping properties are incredible - I've still got a glass 1977 bottle of it that I occasionally check, and it's still going strong. Adding sodium sulphite to round off the graininess is one way of matching it to faster films, but what about this, a mix of Xtol & Rodinal from Sam Elkind?

Xtol = 100 mL
Water = 400 mL
Rodinal = 4 to 5 mL

http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Rodinal/rodinal.html
 

catem

Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2006
Messages
1,358
Location
U.K.
Format
Multi Format
Martin, have you tried that mixture?

I've started to use Rodinal also just recently for certain things - I found that link when I was searching for info an wondered about it.
I normally use Xtol. I was thinking to mix could either be the best of both worlds, or neither one thing nor the other..
I know these things are very subjective, but interested to hear about what anyone thinks of it...
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,262
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
J.W.Shaw - HYDROQUINONE p-AMINOPHENOL DEVELOPER

Not forgetting another Rodinal concoction

J.W.Shaw - HYDROQUINONE p-AMINOPHENOL DEVELOPER

Warm Toned Print developer. (Using Rodinal)

Solution A

Hydroquinone 16.7 g
Sodium Sulphite 91 g
Citric Acid 6.25 g
Potassium Bromide 3.12 g
Water to 1 litre

Solution B

Sodium Hydroxide 16.7 g
Water to 1 litre

Solution C Potassium Bromide Solution 10% (!00 g/litre)


To Use:
24 ml Soln A
24 ml Soln B
1 ml Rodinal (Agfa)
12 ml Soln C
100 ml Water

Originally formulated for lantern slides this developer works well with warm tone papers.

Ian
 
OP
OP

brofkand

Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2008
Messages
598
Location
North Carolina
Format
Digital
I want to try the rodinal as well. Show the pictures. I´m curious to see them


It'll be a few days. I don't have a neg scanner so I'll have to print the negatives, and it isn't a small affair to set up everything.

Rodinal is awesome. Definitely try it. What developer do you use most often now?
 

Earl Dunbar

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
558
Location
Rochester, N
Format
Multi Format
I have used the Rodinal/XTol combination and like it a lot. I stumbled upon it in the work of Robert Vincent (_Honus_ on flickr & RFF), and he got it from an APUG thread.

One of the beautiful things about Rodinal, IMO, is that for a given concentration most films have the same development time. I've found this the case for 1:100, at least. At that dilution, TX400, TMY2, TMX, APX 100 and FP-4+ all do well @ 20 min/20C. (YMMV, test for individual circumstances, offer not valid in all countries, yadda, yadda.) This makes processing a whole backlog of film a lot easier. :D
 

Mike1234

Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
1,908
Location
South Texas,
Format
4x5 Format
Rodinal Is a...

...high acutance developer meaning is resolves fine tonalities well. I love the stuff but it's been years since I've done any wet process B&W work.
 

Earl Dunbar

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2004
Messages
558
Location
Rochester, N
Format
Multi Format
Ian & Willie: Good to know. I've been giving Pyrocat HD some thought recently, especially for LF work. It's just hard for me to balance more than a couple of developers. I'm so used to Rodinal, and I've been doing a bit of work with XTol on its own. Late this year I'll likely be getting some Harvey's 777 for a small tank line. Too many developers, too little time.
 

Prest_400

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
1,430
Location
Sweden
Format
Med. Format RF
I may start B&W developing and after knowing that 1l of D76/ID11 may develop just a few films, I'm more interested in rodinal. Seems like a 500ml bottle may be able to develop a good quantity of films; 30, 60?
How good are it's keeping properties after opening the bottle? I've read about a year, and some say even decades!
 

Bosaiya

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
396
Location
Sumner, Wash
Format
4x5 Format
I may start B&W developing and after knowing that 1l of D76/ID11 may develop just a few films, I'm more interested in rodinal. Seems like a 500ml bottle may be able to develop a good quantity of films; 30, 60?
How good are it's keeping properties after opening the bottle? I've read about a year, and some say even decades!

Number of films depends on dilution. Typically 1:25, 1:50, or 1:100. Once opened it will last longer than you might ever imagine. There are tales of many decades, just strain out the chunky crystals that form.

At something like $16 a bottle it's a small investment.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,262
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Ian & Willie: Good to know. I've been giving Pyrocat HD some thought recently, especially for LF work. It's just hard for me to balance more than a couple of developers. I'm so used to Rodinal, and I've been doing a bit of work with XTol on its own. Late this year I'll likely be getting some Harvey's 777 for a small tank line. Too many developers, too little time.

Fomapan films are the only exception, I should have added that earlier, they require about 2/3rds the dev time of other films or end up very contrasty.

Ian
 

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,661
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
Go for it Prest. At 1+50 and assuming that 300ml of solution is all you need (at least for my Jobo tank) it will process 80+ films (6ml per 135 film). It doesn't cost much and it can be stored for a long time after it's opened. If you ever get bored, just put it at the shelf and you can use it again whenever you want. FYI, it cost me 14,5€ about a year and a half ago. Try it with APX100. Brilliant stuff.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom