Rodenstock Trinar or Zeiss Nettar

Three pillars.

D
Three pillars.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 25
Water from the Mountain

A
Water from the Mountain

  • 3
  • 0
  • 62
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam

A
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam

  • 0
  • 0
  • 51
Lotus

A
Lotus

  • 4
  • 0
  • 68
Magpies

A
Magpies

  • 4
  • 0
  • 100

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,521
Messages
2,760,534
Members
99,394
Latest member
Photogenic Mind
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
2,349
Location
Merimbula NSW Australia
Format
Multi Format
Also pretty sure that Zeiss didn't manufacture the Novars, they were sourced elsewhere.....Rodenstock is the odds on favourite. I too was surprised about the Kodak Anastigmat on the Vollendas being a triplet, done some research and found that this is the case.
I have a post war Zeiss Nettar with a coated Novar, amazing performer, nicely built too. This to me would be the ideal street shooter, solid and very compact....people wouldn't take you seriously either!
 

ntenny

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
2,439
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Format
Multi Format
I thought it was generally agreed that at least some Novars were made on contract by other manufacturers, including Goerz (pre-merger) for certain. The Vade Mecum goes into some detail about possible manufacturers, but I don't know how strong its supporting information is. Contract manufacturing by other factories isn't inconsistent with the lens being "a Zeiss design", though---they could well have provided detailed specs and contracted out the actual manufacturing.

But as I say, I don't know what the ultimate authority is. The Vade Mecum says a lot of helpful things like "One account is that..."

-NT
 
OP
OP

Darkroom317

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
653
Location
Mishawaka, IN
Format
Large Format
Just received my Voigtländer Bessa with a Vaskar 1:4.5 105 set in a Compur Rapid shutter. The camera is in beautiful condition. However, the lower shutter speed are off (not a big surprise given the age). It will need a CLA. Does anyone have any experience with Jurgen Kreckel?
 

elekm

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
2,055
Location
New Jersey (
Format
35mm RF
One thing to remember. Carl Zeiss (Jena) and Zeiss Ikon aren't the same operation and can't be used interchangeably.

Zeiss Ikon did in fact hold the trademark to the Novar name. Although it never carries the name of the manufacturer, early versions of the Novar occasionally carry a serial number. I've never seen a Novar with a serial number on postwar cameras.

It's correct that the Novar was made by third-party lens makers, including Rodenstock, Steinheil and others.

Another fact: You'll never see the Novar on a camera other than a Zeiss Ikon, and if you do, it's not the original lens. And you'll never see a Rodenstock-branded lens on a Zeiss Ikon. Again, if you do, it's not the original lens.

Zeiss Ikon cameras were only allowed to use either a Novar or Carl Zeiss lenses with three exceptions:

1) Following the 1926 merger, you'll still see lenses from the predecessor companies, as it took a while to sort out production and the eventual product line.

2) After World War II and before Carl Zeiss had fully restarted lens production, Zeiss Ikon was permitted to use a Schneider-Kreuznach Xenar as its premium lens. I've seen Xenars on the Ikonta 35 and Super Ikonta A but not a Contax.

3) From what I can tell, just one lens survived the 1926 merger and World War II. It was the humble Goerz Frontar, which was used on nearly all Box Tengors (one Baby Box Tengor model uses a Novar) and a very cheap 1960s Instamatic.

Well, all that is enough to make your head spin.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom