Rodenstock 127mm Ysaron or Kodak Ektar 127mm

Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 1
  • 0
  • 10
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 1
  • 1
  • 23
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 5
  • 167
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 163

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,814
Messages
2,781,224
Members
99,710
Latest member
LibbyPScott
Recent bookmarks
0

Andrew Moxom

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
4,888
Location
Keeping the
Format
Multi Format
Which of these two lenses would give me more coverage with less fall off at the edges? I already have the Ektar and notice the fall off quite a bit, but have a lead on a Ysaron version with prontor press shutter for a good deal. It may worth getting even if just for the prontor press shutter.

So what sayeth the gurus on better coverage and what would be sharpest?

Thanks
 

Jim Noel

Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
2,261
Format
Large Format
The Ektar lens is superior to the Ysaron in design nd performance. The Ektar stopped downto 22 should cover 4x5 with some movements.
 

John Kasaian

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2002
Messages
1,021
IMHO both will cover 4x5 though without much wiggle room. Both are very nice lenses for what they are (and they are both quite sharp and well corrected for color!) My uncoated wartime production 127 Ektar is a keeper. I had a 127 Ysaron and gave it to a friend, then I bought a second 127 Ysaron just for the shutter so I'll have something in which to mount the $40 270mm G Claron I'll win on ebay some day in the future :wink:

Keep in mind that the 127 Ektar was used primarily on press cameras like Speed Graphics which were usually shot handheld, so the ability of any usable movements were really a non-issue.

If what you want is a cheap lens, both the Ektar and Ysaron are excellent if availability of movements aren't an issue. OTOH if you want movements there are plenty of lenses going for not much more that will give you much greater satisfaction. I'd recommend checking out a 120 Angulon.
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
My 127mm Kodak Ektar is a Tessar type lens that came together with my 3.25" X 4.25"
Crown Graphic. It covers the 3.25" X 4.25" format ok...

My 127mm Rodenstock Ysaron is also a Tessar design and it also covers the 3.25" X 4.25" format ok...
 

Wade D

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
897
Location
Jamul, CA
Format
Multi Format
I have both of those lenses. They cover the field on my Speed Graphic just fine and are both sharp. They also cover the limited movements on my Crown View without much of a problem when stopped down enough.
 

weasel

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
171
Format
Medium Format
I have both, and and honestly can't tell the difference in image. Little/no room for movements, but great almost point and shoot lenses for a speed graphic.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom