Hello everyone,
I recently acquired a Stopclock Pro and while doing all sorts of tests and trying out with it, I stumbled across (or rather: over) a behaviour that appears to be somewhat odd to me.
First of all, by "no delay", I do not mean the countdown-delay that can be set in the user menu for enlargers that require a minute amount of warmup-time in order to reach full lamp brightness.
What I am talking about is the short delay between pushing the start/stop button and the lamp coming on, together with the timer starting, which is meant to "get your hands in the right place" according to the RH Designs introduction video for the Stopclock Pro.
The thing is, my Stopclock does indeed delay the lamp/countdown after pushing the Start button, but is ONLY doing so during the base exposure. There is no delay when using any of the burn-in program slots.
So, when I don't need my hands/tools under the lens I get a delay, and when I need them there - sometimes both - I don't.
And even if I switched things around and used the base exposure as a burning in-step, I could only do so once, since all the subsequent programmable steps after that will be un-delayed.
Is there a secret user option that I'm missing here?
Is this behaviour normal?
Is it a deliberate design choice or a technical difficulty? If it's the former, it sure feels like trying to annoy people into buying a foot switch in order to free up their hands, which wouldn't sit too well with me
.
All the best,
David
PS: Also, my copy came with a rattly Start/Stop switch right out of the box which doesn't impede function but is somewhat unfortunate, especially with all the other buttons feeling so solid.
They really appear to try and sell that foot switch to me
.
Edit:
Please don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to nag and think it's a great piece of equipment that will save me more than one headache. But the behaviour described above still strikes me as odd. And although a rattly button would'nt usually make me lose my cool, I think at this price point and right out of the box it's somewhat of a shame.
I recently acquired a Stopclock Pro and while doing all sorts of tests and trying out with it, I stumbled across (or rather: over) a behaviour that appears to be somewhat odd to me.
First of all, by "no delay", I do not mean the countdown-delay that can be set in the user menu for enlargers that require a minute amount of warmup-time in order to reach full lamp brightness.
What I am talking about is the short delay between pushing the start/stop button and the lamp coming on, together with the timer starting, which is meant to "get your hands in the right place" according to the RH Designs introduction video for the Stopclock Pro.
The thing is, my Stopclock does indeed delay the lamp/countdown after pushing the Start button, but is ONLY doing so during the base exposure. There is no delay when using any of the burn-in program slots.
So, when I don't need my hands/tools under the lens I get a delay, and when I need them there - sometimes both - I don't.
And even if I switched things around and used the base exposure as a burning in-step, I could only do so once, since all the subsequent programmable steps after that will be un-delayed.
Is there a secret user option that I'm missing here?
Is this behaviour normal?
Is it a deliberate design choice or a technical difficulty? If it's the former, it sure feels like trying to annoy people into buying a foot switch in order to free up their hands, which wouldn't sit too well with me
.All the best,
David
PS: Also, my copy came with a rattly Start/Stop switch right out of the box which doesn't impede function but is somewhat unfortunate, especially with all the other buttons feeling so solid.
They really appear to try and sell that foot switch to me
.Edit:
Please don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to nag and think it's a great piece of equipment that will save me more than one headache. But the behaviour described above still strikes me as odd. And although a rattly button would'nt usually make me lose my cool, I think at this price point and right out of the box it's somewhat of a shame.
Last edited:

