Clarification: HDPE (high density polyethylene) is NOT a good choice for developer, because of high permeability to air oxygen. Soda bottles are likely PET (polyethylene teraphtalate) a vastly better oxygen barrier. Hopefully, where you live, bottles bear a code indicating (for recycling) what type of plastic; can't help you as I live in Yurp.For developers you must use glass or high density plastics
Clarification: HDPE (high density polyethylene) is NOT a good choice for developer, because of high permeability to air oxygen. Soda bottles are likely PET (polyethylene teraphtalate) a vastly better oxygen barrier. Hopefully, where you live, bottles bear a code indicating (for recycling) what type of plastic; can't help you as I live in Yurp.
If your actual goal is not small bottles per se, but safe storage of developer, wine pouches also have (understandably) a low oxygen permeability. Either recycled (may be hard to disconnect the spigot) or bought new (some even have a separate opening for filling. D-76 partly used, one year, no discoloration or loss of activity.
Also, if you are not too far from a university, try contacting the chemistry dept (1-litre brown bottles) or the people in electronics or material science doing photolithography (0.25litre bottles of photoresist; 2.5 litre bottles of isopropanol or acetone, empty of course).
NO NO NO, a 16 fl oz bottle will hold, virtually, a full half liter. Remember that the companies who fill these bottles NEVER fill them all the way. The extra 27 mL (473 + 27 = 500) is taken up with air, but should NOT be empty when filling with developer.Any bottle used for carbonated beverages is not going to be gas permeable. PET is a good choice. I've got a lot of glass bottles too, from kombucha bottles to beer bottles (as long as they have resealable tops).
Something to keep in mind: 16 oz is just a bit less than 500ml. If you mix metric, like I do, it's often irritating to have to toss that little bit of fresh developer that won't fit into the 16-oz bottle... Even more gets wasted with 32-oz bottles when you're trying to squeeze in a liter. Try to find metric-sized containers if possible.
Best,
Doremus
I have an odd situation, where I have 60+ rolls of film that I shot like 40 years ago that are still sitting in my freezer.
.
This is a point well bought up, albeit its effect on standard developers is usually null.PET bottles cannot withstand strong alkali. Though that should not be an issue for the OP's use.
Pardon my complete ignorance here, which film chemicals are strong alkalis? I guess I will need to use glass for those chemicals.PET bottles cannot withstand strong alkali. Though that should not be an issue for the OP's use.
@pentaxuser No Pan F. Only Kodak Plus-X and Tri-x, all bulk-loaded. I still have my bulk-loader, carefully stored in the original box.If any of those rolls are Ilford Pan F films then it would be much appreciated if you could report back how they in particular turned out. Indeed I and I suspect many others would be interested to find out what rankings you give to the success and failure rate of the various films
Depending on how long you have been here and how closely you follow threads you may have seen comments including one made by Ilford about the need to develop Pan F fairly quickly after exposure. It may have poorer latent image stability than a lot of other films
Thanks
pentaxuser
Groesch bottles are the best. Air tight, dark amber, resealable and the perfect size.I feel a lot more comfortable with glass, filled to the top and well sealed. Stores that sell brewing supplies have good ones, with wire and rubber sealing devices, and some beers come with bottles that have excellent resealing devices (but you have to drink the beer before you can use them). My chemicals keep great in old Groesch beer bottles that have the wire and red rubber sealers.
@CMoore Thanks for this link. At first, I thought I needed to order like hundreds at a time. No, I can order just 5 or 10. At this price, it's a no-brainer. No need to reuse old bottles or worry about issues with PETE plastic bottles.they really are not very expensive, are easy to clean and they last a LONG Time
https://www.specialtybottle.com/glass-bottles/amber-boston-rounds/larger-sizes
@beemermark On Amazon, these bottles are 16 oz. Can you fill them up to 500 ml?Groesch bottles are the best. Air tight, dark amber, resealable and the perfect size.
Can the 16 oz bottles fill up to 500 ml (17 oz?)they really are not very expensive, are easy to clean and they last a LONG Time
https://www.specialtybottle.com/glass-bottles/amber-boston-rounds/larger-sizes
David, sounds like you and I have had similar experience finding out about CD concentrate in PET bottles mine was with an E6 kit, same issue. Stress cracking made the bottle brittle, started to leak. The 50mL booze bottles is something I hadn't thought of.This is a point well bought up, albeit its effect on standard developers is usually null.
But, AgX is correct with some solutions. For example, Part C of the RA4 Kodak color paper developer CANNOT be stored in PET plastic. I found out the hard way, many years ago. That Part C does not need to be kept air tight, but it MUST be stored either in its original container or a glass bottle. - David Lyga
I've found most pint "Boston Rounds" will hold 500ml. I prefer Nalgene HDPE over glass. HDPE is what Tetenal and Kodak use, great chemical resistance.Can the 16 oz bottles fill up to 500 ml (17 oz?)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?