Just as with a pre-order for a known product
David A. Goldfarb said:This is true, but personality issues aside, I think Michael is a pretty good judge of what a decent paper is, and that he has enough to lose by putting his name behind a bad product not to release it unless it's good. I might lose the cost of a couple of boxes of paper if Michael turns out to be unreliable, but he will lose much more, and there are many worse things to risk a few hundred dollars over.
mark said:The original post was nothing but a cheesy advertisement! MAS has yet to respond here but responded to questions on his forum after his post here. I thought sean did not allow advertisements except from sponsors and only in the sponsor portion of the site. You'ld think the original poster would try to answer some of the questions, but no. I don't see any response what-so-ever.
Eric Rose said:I'm with JandC on this. I've had enough of MAS bashing in all of it's forms. Lets keep this forum positive please.
jandc said:To be fair, the posters on the AZO forum actually asked questions about the paper and it's contrast, curves etc. The posters here asked retorical questions amounting to "how dare you ask us to fund this paper". What exactly is the man supposed to answer to these kind of questions? Any response will not be good enough and will only result in an all out flame war.
mark said:John,
Yes I am irked with the way MAS has posted and ignored this thread. It feels like SPAM. On the other hand if he does come back and respond to questions I will know otherwise.
I suppose I see how someone might construe some posters and their comments as being antiMAS based on their history. Maybe even myself as I have questioned his business practices before.
My point was not who posted but the way it was posted. If Michael answers the questions posed or maybe comes on and makes another statement then I will have been proven wrong, and I will admit it. But as it is I stand by my posts. The first one and the second.
I think Jay posed a valid question. I do not have even 100 dollars to chuck toward a sight unseen and untested in it's final form product. I am intrigued by this venture but unless Jay's question is answered I don't see being able to justify my meager funds to preorder. I had the same question as Jay and can only speak for myself. If his answer to the question is sufficient to convince me then I will put my check in the mail. Otherwise I won't, which probably won't matter to anyone anyway.
I for one have no desire to start or participate in a flame war.
Daniel Lawton said:I agree with Aggie. If you want to try the paper and think it might be a worthwhile investment then do so. If you'd rather wait and see then go ahead and wait. I don't see the point of making it a personal issue and trying to derail the man's efforts. If I was an AZO user I'd buy a box out of curiosity and if I found it subpar I'd try something else just like any other photographic product I try. Personally I don't see anything unethical about someone posting info on their contact paper in the contact printing forum. Considering the remaining supplies of AZO are probably going to vanish much faster than some seem to think, I would imagine more contact printers would be interested.
jdef said:I feel very certain that if I had announced this venture, I would be expected to answer all of these questions and more. Anyone capable of objectivity can read this thread, the questions raised, and the responses to those questions, and determine for themselves where the passion lies. Those of us who've raised legitimate questions have been chastised and attacked personally for doing so, and this is a matter of record. Whenever MAS is questioned, regardless of merit or tone, the questioner is deemed to be "bashing" by those who so fervently and unquestioningly support MAS. It is a pattern older than this site. So be it. Good luck to you all.
Jay
Donald Miller said:Jay,
I I have however many years in the business sector...having started and operated several business ventures. I have never had the cajones to ask someone to invest in what some would consider to be snake oil ventures.
mrcallow said:Just to get a few facts straight.
Donald, based upon previous posts you have an axe to grind.
Jay, I honestly believe you when you say it wouldn't matter if it was M&P or someone else.
Everyone here is pretty smart and responsible. I'll bet they can figure out the pros and cons all by themselves.
sanking said:Donald,
That would be "cojones" (balls), not "cajones" (drawers, crates).
Paradoxically, people who are afraid to take risks fall into the "sin cojones" category. On the other hand, folks who have a lot of "cajones" simply have a lot of storage space.
Sandy
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?