mark said:
John,
Yes I am irked with the way MAS has posted and ignored this thread. It feels like SPAM. On the other hand if he does come back and respond to questions I will know otherwise.
I suppose I see how someone might construe some posters and their comments as being antiMAS based on their history. Maybe even myself as I have questioned his business practices before.
My point was not who posted but the way it was posted. If Michael answers the questions posed or maybe comes on and makes another statement then I will have been proven wrong, and I will admit it. But as it is I stand by my posts. The first one and the second.
I think Jay posed a valid question. I do not have even 100 dollars to chuck toward a sight unseen and untested in it's final form product. I am intrigued by this venture but unless Jay's question is answered I don't see being able to justify my meager funds to preorder. I had the same question as Jay and can only speak for myself. If his answer to the question is sufficient to convince me then I will put my check in the mail. Otherwise I won't, which probably won't matter to anyone anyway.
I for one have no desire to start or participate in a flame war.
Mark,
How do you know when you walk into a new restaurant that the meal you're about to get is going to be any good? How do know if a paper or film you've never tried is any good? You may say that you rely on what others have said about it. But then how do you know that those that have reported on this film or paper know what they are talking about? How many papers are out there that one person hates and another person swears by? How many posts on this very forum saying film X stinks and film Y is the best thing ever created and the reverse? How many people have tried Kodak AZO and written that it's no big deal? You will never know if you like this paper unless you use it. If you buy it in advance or buy it after it hits the market your risk is the same.
We could "what if" this thing for years and get nowhere. There will always be a "what if" to any answer.
There is no logic to the question because he has already answered it. MAS has indicated on the AZO forum that test runs will be done on the production machinery before the final run is made. These test runs will be approved by MAS. If MAS approves it then it's the paper he feels is worthy of a replacement for AZO. It doesn't matter if you, I or anyone else thinks it's great. He's selling his vision of what a AZO replacement should be like. That's what anyone who puts their money down is paying for.
He specifically posted the link to the forum here and did not specify any details. His link which he posted contains the answer to the question. I really don't understand what all the fuss is.
If people hate MAS, hate the way he's going about this, are adverse to risk, adverse to putting up money on a new venture than fine don't put your money down and go about your business. If people want to support MAS, take risks, want to see a new paper born or whatever than also fine and they will put their money down and take their chances. If someone can't afford the paper or the risk that's fine too. It's all good whichever way you go and however you feel about it.
I guess the only question people need to ask themselves is if this had been done and announced by anyone other than MAS would we be having this discussion?
For myself, I'm done with the "what ifs" and won't continue to post on this thread.
Regards,
John