@Minolta93 that is a great question. I was wondering too, and I have found several online services that can 3D print metal parts at extremely high precision (0.02 mm resolution) using wide variety of metals, even titanium, and their prices are getting lower quite rapidly. I have not tried any of them personally, however, but it is evident to me that this industry is evolving quickly. So I am hopeful.
Although the component is called a "spring" in the manual, its not a typical coil spring (see: https://retinarescue.com/images/rangefinder/07advance.jpg), and it wouldn't be simple to fabricate. You can purchase the part from Micro-Tools.de but the price is 56 Euros plus shipping. It is easier to locate a parts donor camera and steal the spring from it.
Yes I've seen those as well and could be a great idea for camera repair, among other things. It would certainly help to have the ability to design parts that you'd need, though. The thing about metal printing is the prints seem to be quite porous due to the nature of the sintering process that they use. Perhaps these parts may not be a good fit for all applications, but certainly they'd have their uses.
And besides metal, practically any part on a camera that's made of polymer could be printed at home, and even things that were metal may be replaced if needed. I have seen people 3d print a part and then use that to create a mold and cast it from aluminum or brass at home.
I figured it was some sort of leaf spring--is it just that small bent piece of metal there? I'm sure someone who has experience fabricating these parts could do it, but as for the average person trying to fix a camera, I'm not so sure. Although that image is different from my Retina IIa, mine is a type 150 as far as I know looking at the serial number, and the film advance doesn't have a lever, just a knob. I think the camera was produced in 1939. The spring is probably similar between models, right?
I've had so much trouble w/ "expert" camera repair people over the last 20 or 30 years it's not even funny. This was my normal experience: Inability or refusal to communicate, charging more than the estimate, and less than stellar repair work.
To address this craziness, long ago I decided that my cameras would be of two varieties.....the ones that could be repaired by me, and the ones that could be economically replaced. This philosophy fixed a continuing problem that never seemed to get any better. After a while you figure out cause and effect.
Wondering when you'll get your camera back for long periods of time and having to send it back to be fixed properly is NOT part of the photographic experience.[/QUOTE
I don't know about the U.S but in the UK law an estimate isn't legally binding because it's a round and about , a quotation is. I always insist on a written quotation from any tradesman I employ.
If yours is a knob-advance type, then there is no frame counter spring in it. Those are only in the IIa model with the fast wind lever.
If your frame counter doesn’t work, it’s likely because of grease and dirt accumulating under the top cover. It’s also possible it’s been broken by being forced by someone who didn’t know how to operate the camera.
I see. I'd assume it's the latter, but hopefully soon I'll get around to opening it up and I can see what's really going on.
It's too bad there can't be opportunities for young people to apprentice with expert techs to learn the trade.
Good to hear that.Precision Camera Works 'recently' advertised to take on/train camera techs.
Harry Fleenor has his son working with him now.
Walters Camera Repair in LA has young doods working for them (the old guy passed away a few years ago)
Eric Hendrickson (Pentax) has people working for him apparently - that was the excuse he gave me when my LX was returned b@ggerd up..
It seems the 'real' camera repair businesses are on-going concerns.
For those that know, how long would a full strip down of a camera and rebuild take? For example, in the UK people charge £150-200 for a CLA and rangefinder alignment for a Leica M. If that a CLA like that is a couple of hours work that is a pretty good earner. I suppose repairs can take a lot longer and you're not charging much more so it averages to more modest sums...?
I have long been wondering what "CLA" even means, and I think I've posted a question here earlier. Apparently a CLA comes down to "whatever a tech thinks is right". This can be a 10-minute cleaning with some electronics cleaner, or a full disassembly, re-lubrication and re-assembly.
When I service a Retina IIIc for example, the camera gets stripped completely down to its components, shutter included. Everything gets cleaned, what needs lubricating gets new lube, and reassembled. This model usually takes me 10-12 hours in total. That includes the extra hour or so I often spend addressing cosmetic issues like regluing leatherettes and removal of Zeiss bumps, etc. Cameras that need extra attention (fixing or replacing damaged parts, for example) can take up to 14 hours in total. I expect most complete servicing offered by others involves as many hours, assuming its a complete strip down and cleaning.
The earlier Retinas do not include a fancy rangefinder and shutter/film advance linkages, so those can take as little as 7 hours to service. The Retina II and IIa often take about 9-10 hours.
View attachment 274213
In this photo, the shutter has already been completed, so it is not shown in its disassembled state.
Thanks for that photo and explanation!
It might be that many new people are taking up film photography and there are a lot more cameras that need CLA. Aren;t there people in Japan that do this stuff a lot?I have concerns about the long term availability of experienced and reliable repair resources.
That being said, it seems to me that one of the effects of the lockdowns and other responses to the current, once in a lifetime (I hope) worldwide pandemic is that there is a great likelihood that many people would want to get their cameras fixed.
As my wife refers to it, an example of a "pandemic project".
The current demand might very well ebb a bit after things normalize.
So what do y'all think is a reasonable amount of time to wait for a repair, and when does it cross over into unreasonable?
The only “unreasonable” wait time is one that exceeds the repairman’ s longest estimate.
When you've forgotten that you sent it in, it's been too long.So what do y'all think is a reasonable amount of time to wait for a repair, and when does it cross over into unreasonable?
Worse is when the repaired camera arrives after you bought a replacement.When you've forgotten that you sent it in, it's been too long.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?