Regarding development times

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 8
  • 2
  • 87
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 119
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 6
  • 267

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,745
Messages
2,780,253
Members
99,692
Latest member
jglong
Recent bookmarks
0

Kawaiithulhu

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
549
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
Weren’t you putting together a WWII era darkroom? Haaa a Jobo must look conspicuously out of place...
It totally does, I'm getting practical in my old age and want to try some color and I've got a pile of Portra and a few rolls Velvia 120 to mess around with and don't want to spend all my time tempering everything manually. Along the way I've learned to enjoy Rodinal, rubylith, and a quiet extraction fan, though =)
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
This question has been bothering me:

I develop in a small Paterson tank. From the moment I pour the chemicals, it takes a few seconds before they have all gone inside the tank. For 135 the difference is very little, but for 120 it can take about 10 seconds. Where do you start your timing, the moment you pour the chemical, or the moment it has all gotten inside the tank?
I'm guessing it shouldn't make an appreciable difference, but I'm still wondering what other people do.

Also, my searches didn't turn up anything, so apologies if the question has already been addressed.

hi rho sigma

when i am done pouring in i start the clock.
i gave up on the published times and charts a long time ago
and have my own times i use that seem to work out OK
the published times are a starting point so
start the clock whenever you want :smile:
I'm definitely not a cork sniffing connoisseur of technique,
i like that and might have to quote you at some point :smile:
 

KenS

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
941
Location
Lethbridge, S. Alberta ,
Format
Multi Format
This question has been bothering me:

I develop in a small Paterson tank. From the moment I pour the chemicals, it takes a few seconds before they have all gone inside the tank. For 135 the difference is very little, but for 120 it can take about 10 seconds. Where do you start your timing, the moment you pour the chemical, or the moment it has all gotten inside the tank?
I'm guessing it shouldn't make an appreciable difference, but I'm still wondering what other people do.

Also, my searches didn't turn up anything, so apologies if the question has already been addressed.



Might I suggest that you fill the tank to the required volume o developer BEFORE you put the loaded film reel into the tank. The "bottom" to "top" differential will be but a second( (or so).
Ken
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,873
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
One of the advantages of having a repeatable routine is that it becomes a habit, and with habits and the semi-automatic actions included in them, one is much more likely to notice a change or error than if one is constantly changing the approach.
It is like riding a bicycle - if you have to think about keeping your balance, you are much more likely to fall.
 

David Allen

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
991
Location
Berlin
Format
Med. Format RF
One of the advantages of having a repeatable routine is that it becomes a habit, and with habits and the semi-automatic actions included in them, one is much more likely to notice a change or error than if one is constantly changing the approach.
It is like riding a bicycle - if you have to think about keeping your balance, you are much more likely to fall.
+1
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom