Reducing depth of field on RZ67

Diner

A
Diner

  • 3
  • 0
  • 66
Gulf Nonox

A
Gulf Nonox

  • 9
  • 3
  • 84
Druidstone

A
Druidstone

  • 8
  • 3
  • 119
On The Mound.

A
On The Mound.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 69
Ancient Camphor

D
Ancient Camphor

  • 6
  • 1
  • 79

Forum statistics

Threads
197,806
Messages
2,764,778
Members
99,480
Latest member
815 Photo
Recent bookmarks
0

Cyberdog

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
6
Location
London, UK
Format
Medium Format
I have an RZ67 Professional body with the 250mm f4.5 lens and I'm wondering if there is any way I can get a very narrow depth of field (similar to 1.4 or 2.8) with the lens I have.

I can't affort to shell out for a 2.8 lens and I'm looking for a shortcut.

I appreciate any suggestions anyone can offer. Thanks!
 

Helen B

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
1,590
Location
Hell's Kitch
Format
Multi Format
Do you have any faster lenses at other focal lengths? Could they be used instead? Is the 250 mm perspective important?

Best,
Helen
 

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format
I gather from your post that you are more familiar with 35 mm then you are with medium format. The lens selection available to medium format is usually far more limited and the lenses typically have a smaller maximum aperture then a 35 mm lens. There is no 2.8 or 1.4 lens of the focal length that you have offered by Mamiya according to my information.

Since aperture is a measurement of iris opening related to focal length of a lens this really is not as much of a problem as one would at first assume because longer focal lengths have a shorter equivalency when compared to the 35 mm format.

If you were doing close up photography, you could opt for close up lenses as supplements to your prime lens. This would give you a greatly diminished depth of field.

http://www.camerafilters.com/pages/closeup.aspx

Good luck.
 
Joined
Jun 7, 2005
Messages
800
Location
Torino, Italy
Format
Large Format
If you could expand what you have in mind, perhaps that would help. I personally think that DOF with a 250mm f:4,5 (the sole ever released for the RB/RZ system AFAIK) is so shallow to be a compelling problem all of the times. I can hardly understand what use could have a DOF reduced even further.
 
OP
OP
Cyberdog

Cyberdog

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
6
Location
London, UK
Format
Medium Format
I am indeed. I have only had the camera a short while, and I'm just now getting my feet wet. To be honest, I haven't experimented too much with it yet. This question was more out of curiosity than anything else.

I just bought a polaroid back, so I can experiment a bit more without completely breaking the bank.

Thanks for your comments.
 

jedrek

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Messages
21
Location
Krakow, Pola
Format
Multi Format
Check out the online DOF Calculator to see what your DOF will be with different focal lengths/formats/apertures. Your 250mm f/4.5 will give you 3cm of DOF at 2m - that's not a lot at all.
 

forksphoto

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
26
Location
San Antonio,
Format
Multi Format
Additionally MAC has the DOF tables published. I assume the Sekor C and Sekor Z 250 F4.5 would have exactly the same DOF, and the chart is here:
Dead Link Removed

I have another idea, but I'm not positive if it will reduce DOF, how about using an extension tube, It will reduce your working distance and should effectively reduce DOF along with it, but I'm not positive about that, someone will set me straight real quick if I'm out of order.

Forks
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,952
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
New to the medium

Cyberdog said:
I have an RZ67 Professional body with the 250mm f4.5 lens and I'm wondering if there is any way I can get a very narrow depth of field (similar to 1.4 or 2.8) with the lens I have.

I can't affort to shell out for a 2.8 lens and I'm looking for a shortcut.

I appreciate any suggestions anyone can offer. Thanks!
I think you most be new to M/F Cybordog, with a 250mm lens the D.O.F. at large apertures is very limited indeed theres no such animal as a 250mm 1.4 or 2.8 for 6x7, and if there was it would be too heavy to pick up. Try doing some shots at 4.5 and the larger lens openings as a test, I can't believe that you get too much D.O.F with this optic.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom