Reala, unimpressive colors?

A window to art

D
A window to art

  • 0
  • 0
  • 17
Bushland Stairway

Bushland Stairway

  • 4
  • 1
  • 65
Rouse st

A
Rouse st

  • 6
  • 3
  • 105
Do-Over Decor

A
Do-Over Decor

  • 1
  • 1
  • 114

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,239
Messages
2,788,385
Members
99,840
Latest member
roshanm
Recent bookmarks
0

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
I just got back from the lab my first roll of Reala. I was less than impressed with the results and I'm wondering if it is a lab issue or I just am not meant for Reala.

Would you expect better?

7806865644_0cbc76cf21_b.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 7806865644_0cbc76cf21_b.jpg
    7806865644_0cbc76cf21_b.jpg
    648.2 KB · Views: 100

timparkin

Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
212
Format
35mm
I just got back from the lab my first roll of Reala. I was less than impressed with the results and I'm wondering if it is a lab issue or I just am not meant for Reala.

Would you expect better?

7806865644_0cbc76cf21_b.jpg


It looks fine to me but does have a bit of a cyan/green cast.. Here's a colour balanced shot how I would expect to see that scene

http://static.timparkin.co.uk/static/scans/7806865644_0cbc76cf21_b-ref.jpg

The scan or print isn't particularly great - highlights are blown. Here's a frame from a colleague that I scanned recently - 135mm taken on a £20 Minolta SLR

http://static.timparkin.co.uk/static/tmp/don2.jpg

It's a progressive jpg so it'll gradually get better resolution in three iterations. (i.e. it will look awful quickly, slowly OK, finally it'll look pretty good)

Tim
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2006
Messages
4,829
Location
İstanbul
Format
35mm
I saw many highly successful Reala shots when I was researching toy panaromic cameras. This is highly desaturated , low contrast and looks foggy image. Film processing completely died here , whatever camera , whichever film you use , you got terrible negatives. I am working with them with % 90 loss expectation.
If they continue to process your films like it , dont bother , buy a good digital camera . Or switch to bw but China is colorful and you dont want to lose it.
 
OP
OP
RattyMouse

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
I saw many highly successful Reala shots when I was researching toy panaromic cameras. This is highly desaturated , low contrast and looks foggy image. Film processing completely died here , whatever camera , whichever film you use , you got terrible negatives. I am working with them with % 90 loss expectation.
If they continue to process your films like it , dont bother , buy a good digital camera . Or switch to bw but China is colorful and you dont want to lose it.

Thank you. I am going to try a different lab.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
I normally view the first print as a proof rather than a final print especially if it comes from a lab I haven't used regularly.

Specific to this photo, I think it is probably just a color balance issue. It could be operator error or just the automated software.

Talk to the lab, tell them what disappointed you and have a new print made. Once they know what you want (and you have a good sample) they can probably get your prints much closer to what you want next time.
 

jp498

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,525
Location
Owls Head ME
Format
Multi Format
You will almost never get prints from a mass production lab the way you want them. As said, they are just proofs. Back pre-digital, people who were fed up with the labs inability to get things right on color negative film would shoot slide film. No room for the labs to screw that up because they didn't print it.

Now, your options are to scan your negatives yourself, have a color darkroom, or work with a someone of skill at a lab to get the colors right.
 

TareqPhoto

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
1,171
Location
Ajman - UAE
Format
Multi Format
To my eyes, this is not a great successful processed Reala, i can say this is just good or so so, i have shoot Reala and it is my top favorite color neg, so i am sure this shot or even the roll went wrong somewhere, try another lab and shoot another roll and give it a look.

Good luck!
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,110
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
My father (and many others) used to use Reala for weddings due to its ability to render skin tones correctly whilst keeping wedding dresses white.

I think it's more of a case of Reala being the wrong film for your purpose rather than a problem with it or the processing.


Steve.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
My father (and many others) used to use Reala for weddings due to its ability to render skin tones correctly whilst keeping wedding dresses white.

I think it's more of a case of Reala being the wrong film for your purpose rather than a problem with it or the processing.


Steve.

Generally agree, but also agree with the folks who say this print isn't that great. The automated machines tend to not correct density as much as I would when printing, so an overexposed color negative, which can easily make a great print, will come out desaturated and too light. I bet this can be printed much better.

If you want a lot more saturation for flowers, grass etc. try Ektar 100.
 

madgardener

Member
Joined
May 28, 2011
Messages
406
Location
Allentown PA
Format
35mm
Please forgive my ignorance here, but is Reala still being manufactured? I was under the impression it was discontinued years ago??
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
I haven't shot Reala in years, but isn't a portrait film that supresses facial blemishes?
 

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
If this is a lab print, it's a scan and digital print. Blame the scan operator and try an optical print directly to RA4. However, it's a very overcast scene and Reala (unsurprisingly for its name) has fairly accurate saturation so the photo is kind of flat. If you want more punch, try Ektar. But really, the fault here is your choice of lighting not the film's.

Reala can look pretty good IMHO and is quite available at least in 120.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,975
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Change your lab, I've used Reala for years, and it's not only colourful but also very sharp, this says it all Dead Link Removed
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
Looks like a reasonable result from a scan. Based on the assessment of the scene, it looks realistic. As others have said, maybe you need to use a more saturated or contrasty film.
 

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
It ma depend on where you live.

I find Reala not to my liking in Southern California and Nevada light. It comes out dull and lifeless.
 

Diapositivo

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 1, 2009
Messages
3,257
Location
Rome, Italy
Format
35mm
My personal attempt somewhere attached to this message.

I would be very wary in judging a film when there are so many variables involved:
- developing;
- filtering;
- scanning;
- monitor calibration differences;

I also see a greenish cast in the picture as posted by the original poster. A little bit of this greenish cast on the parapet is probably due to the greenish reflection of the pond, so I did not eliminate it completely so as to avoid a magentaish cast emerging.

The sRGB colour space is in any case inadequate to render the amplitude of the palette of a colour film.

The scanning sacrifices highlights and shadows, burning the former, blocking the latter. It should be very easy for a scanner to capture the entire dynamic range of a negative colour shot. The contrast is then recreated by applying gamma curves while keeping the extremes safe. This looks like the scan of a slide (and that can be improved as well).

The colours seem to be fine although, not being there, I cannot judge on the rendition of the correct hue of the flowers. I don't see any colour problem besides the difficulty in filtering which is somehow intrinsic in the use of negative colour film unless a proper colour-managed workflow is adopted.
 

Attachments

  • 7806865644_0cbc76cf21_b.jpg
    7806865644_0cbc76cf21_b.jpg
    925.4 KB · Views: 97
Last edited by a moderator:

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
It ma depend on where you live.

I find Reala not to my liking in Southern California and Nevada light. It comes out dull and lifeless.

To your point you may not like Reala but it seems we had a similar discussion about poor results from Kodak Ektar and the reason came down to the lowest common denominator - poor scanning and/or post.

Here is a common flower found everywhere in So Cal. This one I took outside LAX.

large.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

wblynch

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
1,697
Location
Mission Viejo
Format
127 Format
I don't recall saying anything against Ektar. I love that film.

I have said that Portra strikes me as too pastel. I do like Portra much more than Reala. That is just my opinion. Only presented to show that not everyone loves Reala.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom