Re-use one-shot developers

Mt Rundle

A
Mt Rundle

  • 1
  • 0
  • 2
Sonatas XII-35 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-35 (Homes)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 18
Ode to Cor

H
Ode to Cor

  • 2
  • 0
  • 69
Moon in Myrtle

D
Moon in Myrtle

  • 5
  • 0
  • 62
Wooden Stone

H
Wooden Stone

  • 2
  • 3
  • 99

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,454
Messages
2,791,815
Members
99,912
Latest member
ArcherKeating
Recent bookmarks
0

joho

Member
Joined
May 13, 2011
Messages
158
Format
Large Format
Doing an experiment with one shot developers like R09 with replenishment.

but have to write it out .....
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
23,824
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Not worth it. Their practical lifespan is in the order of half an hour to a few hours. Even if you were to replenish a developer like this, you'd be shooting a moving target all the time because the degree of oxidation will vary strongly with the time and conditions of use.

Also, why try and save $0.10 on developer? Literally not worth it!
 
OP
OP

joho

Member
Joined
May 13, 2011
Messages
158
Format
Large Format
you are correct !
just got the results not worth it ...
 

cjbecker

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
1,393
Location
IN
Format
Traditional
Some developers get the one shot name but don’t deserve it. Like hc110. I like to mix a tank of it in dilution c 1+19 and use it for a month then toss it. I only developer sheet film and I will never run through the capacity of it before the month is up.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,551
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
Some developers get the one shot name but don’t deserve it. Like hc110. I like to mix a tank of it in dilution c 1+19 and use it for a month then toss it. I only developer sheet film and I will never run through the capacity of it before the month is up.

With the cost of film in every size, i have no interest in reusing developer...
 

cjbecker

Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
1,393
Location
IN
Format
Traditional
With the cost of film in every size, i have no interest in reusing developer...

There is really no downside to using the developer like this. My mix is either a 1/2 gal or 1gal and I can be ready to develop without any setup. Just check temp and adjust time. I just developed 36 hp5 4x5 sheets over the span of 2 weeks in a mix of dilution c. All came out just as expected.

Edit: dip and dunk on hangers. Either Arkay 1gal ss with floating lid or a 1/2 gal yankee with floating lid.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,551
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
There is really no downside to using the developer like this. My mix is either a 1/2 gal or 1gal and I can be ready to develop without any setup. Just check temp and adjust time. I just developed 36 hp5 4x5 sheets over the span of 2 weeks in a mix of dilution c. All came out just as expected.

Edit: dip and dunk on hangers. Either Arkay 1gal ss with floating lid or a 1/2 gal yankee with floating lid.

cjb.....it all depends. My developers of choice are PMK & Pyrocat.... so different animals altogether.
 

Graham06

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Messages
139
Format
Medium Format
Some developers get the one shot name but don’t deserve it. Like hc110. I like to mix a tank of it in dilution c 1+19 and use it for a month then toss it. I only developer sheet film and I will never run through the capacity of it before the month is up.

Here’s another data point for HC110. I have used 550 ml of HC110 B (1+31) as almost my only developer. I used to develop up to 3 rolls of 35mm film and a few sheets in an evening and then discarded it. In the last year I have been keeping it for up to a month in a 500 ml bottle for up to a month with no detectable problems (maybe 3 or 4 developing sessions) towards the end the bottle has an inch or so of air.

This is also starting from syrup that is years expired and darkish brown. Haven’t been trying to break any records; it probably lasts a bit longer.

A test before using it is to dip a piece of film in full light half into developer and note the time it takes the light wet film to return to the same darkness as the dry half

Ilford multigrade 1+9 paper developer lasts less well. Half a bottle of unmixed developer dies in a few years. A tray of 1+9 from a year old half bottle will behave differently at the end of a long day and will be dead if left uncovered overnight. I have stored fresh 1+9 developer in a full bottle overnight for a few days but make fresh test strips each day. You can’t trust a calibrated Analyser Pro or a test strip you made yesterday with this level of imprecision. I should probably throw away my current half bottle.

There is a noticeable difference between uncovered trays, half full bottles and bottles filled to overflowing
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,442
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
One shot developers by definition are good for one development, but may still be active enough to get more properly developed film.
 
OP
OP

joho

Member
Joined
May 13, 2011
Messages
158
Format
Large Format
The idea comes from the old days with Rodinal [agfa] where if a 2d use was immediate \ there was the original first tank 1,2lt. as the first developed 10 min -- there was a #2 tank where less contrast was required for 12min - then dump... all in 24 min.
but for say 4day storage and re-use it will not work.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom