... 120 in an RB offers better cropping opportunities than a 35 mm strip. I can't speak to the highly desirable, some say, sprocket effect. I don't like it and it isn't attainable with 120 film.
It's always a rabbit hole. A 4x5 camera with a 120 back will offer the best cropping opportunity of any mentioned so far. Then there's 8x10, etc.
Donald, True panorama is more than just a funny aspect ratio or exposed sprocket holes. I have a couple of cheap panoramics and they are much more than just a funny long aspect ratio. (BTW welcome back.)
I may be the idiot, because I don't know from firsthand experience. I thought there was a 6x12 roll film back for 4x5 cameras, but I could very well be wrong.Not to be a complete idiot, but what's the difference, except size and weight, between a 4x5 press, technical or view camera with a 2x3 (6x9 is a poor and misleading metric approximation) roll holder and a 2x3 press, technical or view camera with a 2x3 roll holder?
Typically these sprocket-holes pananoramas are cluttered with rebate signing, up to barcodes.Here is a shot with RB67 on 135 film:
I thought there was a 6x12 roll film back for 4x5 cameras, but I could very well be wrong.
Time for thread drift. Why do you call a roll holder a back? I've always understood a press/technical/view camera back to be the part of the camera that somehow accepts a film holder and accepts a detachable focusing panel or has an integral ground glass.
Typically these sprocket-holes pananoramas are cluttered with rebate signing, up to barcodes.
Regarding 2x3, I have looked at those with interest. Specifically, I think, Mamiya Press cameras (aren't those 2x3?).
I know some people detest sprocket holes, but the two subjects I have found so far that I enjoy the look for are those with saturated colors, and beach scenes with my family. It gives the final image such a playful, non-serious look that evokes a certain emotion in me,
Yes, so do I!Sprocket holes just look fun. If one doesn't like them, then crop. For example following photo, I personally like the sprocket version much more.
Street photography with RB67 and using 135 film is the next level on street photography
I have to ask, what film is it that you use vedostuu, that the film has no markings at all on the film rebate = not even the manufacturers name??? (There's probably a really obvious answer to this I'm sure, and will probably kick myself when I read an answer.)What I wanted to indicate is that sprocket holes at the rebate are one thing, them being cluttered with letters, figures and barcode another thing. Which to me decreases the choice of films for this kind of exposure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?