RB why

Wayne · Dec 23, 2015

Why does the rb on my RB67 rotate clockwise to the vertical position instead of counterclockwise? If it rotated counterclockwise I could actually get the dark slide in-out when in vertical mode. But as it stands, the slide hits my tripod head tilt lever.

mweintraub · Dec 23, 2015

I thought that was weird too.

TheFlyingCamera · Dec 23, 2015

Simple workaround (although annoying)- pull the slide before you rotate.

markbarendt · Dec 23, 2015

Probably because using finders other than chimney or waist level would prevent pulling the dark slide.

Doc W · Dec 23, 2015

TheFlyingCamera said:
Simple workaround (although annoying)- pull the slide before you rotate.

That's my solution, but yes, it is irritating.

Sirius Glass · Dec 23, 2015

This would not be a problem if you shot 6x6.

mweintraub · Dec 23, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
This would not be a problem if you shot 6x6.

You can on the RZ!

Doc W · Dec 23, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
This would not be a problem if you shot 6x6.

6x6 IS the problem. It is SQUARE, lol!

Sirius Glass · Dec 23, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
This would not be a problem if you shot 6x6.

Doc W said:
6x6 IS the problem. It is SQUARE, lol!

Square is not a problem it is the perfect format. That is what Hasselblad said. Rollei and Mamiya TLRs used it too. You are just stretching it.

j-dogg · Dec 23, 2015

markbarendt said:
Probably because using finders other than chimney or waist level would prevent pulling the dark slide.

this

Wayne · Dec 23, 2015

markbarendt said:
Probably because using finders other than chimney or waist level would prevent pulling the dark slide.

I knew there had to be a good reason. It was just too weird for a system so otherwise well designed.

Wayne · Dec 23, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
This would not be a problem if you shot 6x6.

This is true.

I went to look at a Bronica 6x6 last weekend but the guy didn't hear me knocking so I never got to see it. But I won't give up my 6x7 anyway

Wayne · Dec 23, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
Square is not a problem it is the perfect format. That is what Hasselblad said. Rollei and Mamiya TLRs used it too. You are just stretching it.

Just making it more perfect.

markbarendt · Dec 23, 2015

Wayne said:
I knew there had to be a good reason. It was just too weird for a system so otherwise well designed.

Until you have a prism finder on the RB it's not obvious.

Might try turning your tripod mount plate on the camera 90...

markbarendt · Dec 23, 2015

Wayne said:
Just making it more perfect.

That's right 6x7 is more perfect.

Doc W · Dec 23, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
Square is not a problem it is the perfect format. That is what Hasselblad said. Rollei and Mamiya TLRs used it too. You are just stretching it.

The vast majority of visual artists would disagree with you. For us, square is a pretty square format. I would have to crop everything.

Wayne · Dec 24, 2015

I never gave square formats any thought in 50 years. But when this thread popped up first a few weeks ago

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

I flipped through some of those mags and...I liked them. If I just look at the images and don't think about what an alien shape they are, they work. I found myself looking at square cameras, but fortunately I can't afford any so I'm safe from becoming a square. For now. I do have a 6x6 negative carrier though so I might not be completely safe.

Doc W said:
The vast majority of visual artists would disagree with you. For us, square is a pretty square format. I would have to crop everything.

Wayne · Dec 24, 2015

markbarendt said:
Until you have a prism finder on the RB it's not obvious.

Might try turning your tripod mount plate on the camera 90...

Yep, I have no prism so that idea escaped me but am starting to think about getting one. I'm learning its really hard to see the viewfinder when you're pointing down into the water without getting in the water.

If I rotate it 90 degrees it'll just hit the other lever, lol.

Wayne · Dec 24, 2015

OK, I have another "RB why". I don't have a Pro-S body or C lenses so maybe its different on those, but I find it weird and annoying that I have to end a time exposure by rotating the aperture ring or by moving the cocking lever. They better have a REAL good reason for that. Even if I cover the lens first I run the risk of camera movement, and it just seems so unnecessary. But I'm still an RB newby. Even though I've had it a few years I've only recently become enamored of it and started using it more.

Sirius Glass · Dec 24, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
Square is not a problem it is the perfect format. That is what Hasselblad said. Rollei and Mamiya TLRs used it too. You are just stretching it.

Doc W said:
The vast majority of visual artists would disagree with you. For us, square is a pretty square format. I would have to crop everything.

None are so blind as those who will not see.

Sirius Glass · Dec 24, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
Square is not a problem it is the perfect format. That is what Hasselblad said. Rollei and Mamiya TLRs used it too. You are just stretching it.

Wayne said:
I never gave square formats any thought in 50 years. But when this thread popped up first a few weeks ago

(there was a url link here which no longer exists)

I flipped through some of those mags and...I liked them. If I just look at the images and don't think about what an alien shape they are, they work. I found myself looking at square cameras, but fortunately I can't afford any so I'm safe from becoming a square. For now. I do have a 6x6 negative carrier though so I might not be completely safe.

Slowly. slowly the screw turns. We have you in our grasp. In time you will succumb to the powers of APUG and the force of GAS shall rise up and envelop you. Your future has been determined. Do not resist. Resistance only hastens to surrender.

:devil:

Wayne · Dec 24, 2015

I've got no money so GAS will by and large escape my grasp. I was kind of glad when the guy with the S2A didn't answer the door...saved me a couple hundred more bucks for film for my RB.

Wayne · Dec 24, 2015

Those blinders look like they are 6 x 7.

Sirius Glass said:
None are so blind as those who will not see.

Sirius Glass · Dec 24, 2015

These blinders look like they are 6x6 to me.

Doc W · Dec 25, 2015

Sirius Glass said:
These blinders look like they are 6x6 to me.

Sirius, that is wishful thinking on your part. Look at the size of 'em. They are clearly 5x7.

RB why

Wayne

mweintraub

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council

markbarendt

Doc W

Sirius Glass

mweintraub

Doc W

Sirius Glass

j-dogg

Wayne

Wayne

Wayne

markbarendt

markbarendt

Doc W

Wayne

Wayne

Wayne

Sirius Glass

Attachments

Sirius Glass

Wayne

Wayne

Sirius Glass

Doc W

RB why

Membership Council

Attachments

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency