What is the difference between those two?It isn't a matter of longevity, it is a matter of unstable chemicals decomposing.
The hardener on its own is useful if you tone your prints.
What is the difference between those two?
Or do you refer to longevity in the meaning of image-stability? Something I first thought of when reading the headline.
My question is if film is cleared with bad fixer, did it do it's job of removing unexposed silver? Can bad fixer shorten the life of negatives?
The problem with fixer that has started to sulfurize is not that it will not fix film but rather that the colloidal sulfur can deposit on the film. Once this happens it is impossible to remove.
A simple test will show you if the fixer is still active. You can carry this out in daylight. Place a piece of unexposed film into the fixer and time it for the recommended fixing period. If the film clears, all is well.I'm still at the point of wondering if Rapid Fix(with or without hardener) once mixed and stored in a container should be tossed after two months, whether it has the ability to fix or not due to this...
Is that the same as the Kodak HT-2 residual hypo test?That is why a retained silver test and a retained hypo test is recommended on your film and paper.
PE
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?