• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Question re: bulk loader and adjusting time vs temperature

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,766
Messages
2,829,804
Members
100,935
Latest member
Fablesilence
Recent bookmarks
0

rayonline_nz

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Messages
658
Location
Wellington,
Format
Multi Format
Hi, what is the reason that after I bulk load my film and I develop them the Kodak brand words are upside down?

Manufacturers provide a development table for different temperature. Over here we use degrees Celsius, the norm being 20. In my case it was 21, are their any issues when one adjust the development time instead of the temperature? It was 14mins vs 12 mins in my case.


Cheers
 

AgX

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,972
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
That would mean you loaded your film wrongly into the cassettes:

-) what results in emulsion to the pressure plate (you likely would have recognized that)

or by

-) starting loading from the inner end of the bulk spool

-) in hand-loading you orientated the spool wrong and wound on the the film the wrong direction



Or the bulk spool was wound wrongly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,861
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format
It means you are holding it upside down.

No, there are no issues as long as you follow the time/temp adjustment chart.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
You can adjust either the development time or the temperature. It doesn't matter. It does help a bit to be consistent in what you do.
 
OP
OP

rayonline_nz

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Messages
658
Location
Wellington,
Format
Multi Format
Ok thanks :smile:

Had another look it is Plus X with an expiry of ~ late 1970s. The numbers are correct left to right - 18, 19, 20 etc. On top the Kodak Plus X branding is upside down. Maybe just how it was back then?
 

Dr Croubie

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 21, 2013
Messages
1,986
Location
rAdelaide
Format
Multi Format
Ok thanks :smile:

Had another look it is Plus X with an expiry of ~ late 1970s. The numbers are correct left to right - 18, 19, 20 etc. On top the Kodak Plus X branding is upside down. Maybe just how it was back then?

If you're shooting film that old, then it's best to throw development charts out the window, no matter film it was to start with and how well it's been stored (fridge, freezer, room temp).
I recommend shooting old film at half box xpeed and developing in Caffenol-C-L, the most common other recommendation is HC-100 dil B.
 
OP
OP

rayonline_nz

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 20, 2010
Messages
658
Location
Wellington,
Format
Multi Format
This is my 6th or so roll of it. It was a partially used bulk roll given to me. Actually held up quite well with just standard development times, I have been told to add 10% longer development time, someone else also had other old film.

https://flic.kr/p/xHehgF
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,141
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
You are wondering why the branding is upside down?

It is because you are in New Zealand, and the film was made for the northern hemisphere.:whistling:

I have no recollection if Plus-X was edge printed that way back then.

But I do have bulk Tri-X negatives from back then where both the branding and the frame numbers are upside down when compared with the image.
 

summicron1

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
2,920
Location
Ogden, Utah
Format
Multi Format
If you're shooting film that old, then it's best to throw development charts out the window, no matter film it was to start with and how well it's been stored (fridge, freezer, room temp).
I recommend shooting old film at half box xpeed and developing in Caffenol-C-L, the most common other recommendation is HC-100 dil B.

I have some plus-x here of indeterminate age, no clue how it was stored, but at least 20 years, maybe more, and it came out fine with standard development in d-71 1:1. Why just hc 110?

IMG_0004.jpg

IMG_0016.jpg
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom