From Kodak Z-131-01:Matt, this is NOT a good advice for C-41. This process is standardized and the development time is the same regardless of either replenishment is used or not. The developer must always be at the same activity level, therefore C-41 developer starter is required.
And replenisher alone will work fine in a one-shot process, provided you adjust time and temperature appropriately - preferably with the aid of control strips.
KODAK FLEXICOLOR Developer Use this developer in unreplenished systems. No starter is needed
There's your problem. You're using hopelessly old/degraded film. No matter what tricks you play with the chemistry, the results will always remain lackluster with this film. If you got good results with fresh film, your chemistry was good at least at that point in time. Yes, you can boost contrast of any film by developing longer or at higher temperature. You can even leave out the starter to get more density, but all these measures will also influence the color balance of the negatives. You may or may not be able to correct this in later printing or scanning. The color problems I've seen with your outdated Konica film won't be correctable however. That particular batch of film, excuse me for saying it this bluntly, is crap and IMO a complete waste of time.Then only recently with 10/2006 dated freezer-stored KONICA VX400 Super did I find on fresh mix 3 mins 15 secs was too short
Bleach never has sulphur. It's not sulphur-based chemistry. It seems you're confusing bleach and fixer here.The Bleach is NEWLY Purchased and the CPAC FIX is still good -- no Sulphur.
Ok, good; yeah, that's the one. Usually PDTA or EDTA.Yes - I know the Bleach does not have 'Sulphur' only that Iron Compound which likes to be 'Oxygenated'
I'm hoping for the best...don't get me wrong; I have nothing against outdated film per se. My default 35mm film has been Superia 200 for a few years now, from the same batch that expired back in 2004. But I know it's been cold-stored since manufacture, it's all from the same batch and it gives consistent and usable results. Similar film from the same general period, but of more various providence...it's a crap shoot. In fact, I dumped all of it recently.Today used another of that 10/2006 Konica VX400 rated 200ASA at a Classic car show -- film drying now.
I think everyone is missing the fact that I am talking about pentaxpete using old, cast-off developer/replenisher and (potentially) un-matched starter.Matt, with all due respect you are mistaken on this. (Old Gregg has it right.) You missed a subtle point in this quote
The reason that "no starter is needed" is because this is not a replenisher, it is an already setup "tank solution," suitable for developing film directly.
Most of the Kodak C-41 "developers" are sold in the form of "replenishers," and labeled as such. For a C-41 developer replenisher Kodak is always clear that to initially fill a processor by using replenisher it is necessary to use a "starter solution" (dilute the developer plus add starter according to the starter instructions). But the particular C-41 "developer" referenced is called only "developer," not "developer replenisher." That subtle difference in terminology is what reveals that it is suitable for developing as is - it is already equivalent to a replenisher treated with starter.
We must be thinking of different examples. I had these in mind: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/can-i-use-e6-blix-for-c41.185607/page-2#post-2449643all I can say is that to date in the pics he has shown us his processing of out dated film has been remarkably successful to my eyes
Looks like severe backing paper/ink issues. I also saw it in the other examples I linked to above. These issues can vary from roll to roll depending on storage conditions and can even vary within a single roll (worse on the outside/start, better on the inside/end). It's not related to the processing chemistry.I attach the few scans of the 'Thin, Flecked film.
I'm just seeing how close the Fuji Negacolor 2 dilution is to Kodak's starter1. What exactly does the C41 Developer Starter do ? I use 'FUJI ENVIRONEG Replenisher Air + Starter cn16L N1-S ' at 30mls/Litre Replenisher given 2x10 Litre Concentrates Parts A.B and C from a mini-lab forced to close.
When I develop I find 3 mins 15 secs @ 100oF is too short -- get under-developed negs.
QUESTION : Can I add LESS STARTER to make the Developer 'Stronger' ?
2. When I used FUJI HUNT C41 BLEACH I got a Violent Reaction on adding the 'Starter' which I did NOT get when I used Kodak Flexicolor III with Starter.
3 . I have : CPAC Trelux dev Starter left over fro when I used to order 'CPAC' chemistry .
Fuji Hunt NEGACOLOR Universal developer Starter 1 litre pack with instructions for differing'Negacolor'
Can I used these still for when my dwindling supply of the Fuji Environeg goes and can I use for 'MYDONEG' ? View attachment 282202 View attachment 282203 View attachment 282204
Matt, with all due respect you are mistaken on this. (Old Gregg has it right.) You missed a subtle point in this quote The reason that "no starter is needed" is because this is not a replenisher, it is an already setup "tank solution," suitable for developing film directly.
Most of the Kodak C-41 "developers" are sold in the form of "replenishers," and labeled as such. For a C-41 developer replenisher Kodak is always clear that to initially fill a processor by using replenisher it is necessary to use a "starter solution" (dilute the developer plus add starter according to the starter instructions). But the particular C-41 "developer" referenced is called only "developer," not "developer replenisher." That subtle difference in terminology is what reveals that it is suitable for developing as is - it is already equivalent to a replenisher treated with starter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?