Quad Tone RIP

Where Did They Go?

A
Where Did They Go?

  • 2
  • 2
  • 30
Red

D
Red

  • 4
  • 3
  • 109
The Big Babinski

A
The Big Babinski

  • 2
  • 6
  • 154
Memoriam.

A
Memoriam.

  • 7
  • 8
  • 205
Self Portrait

D
Self Portrait

  • 3
  • 1
  • 103

Forum statistics

Threads
198,019
Messages
2,768,257
Members
99,528
Latest member
boom125
Recent bookmarks
0

mprosenberg

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Messages
27
I thought I would throw in my two cents worth of comments. I visited Ron (and Judy) earlier in October. We had a fun time photographing old growth forests, and then we came back and developed some film. We scanned one of my negs. and did a calibration curve for printing silver gelatin on Ilford paper. That took 3-4 hrs one afternoon, printing curves and then adjusting the QTR profile (explained in Ron's book and soon his update). The next morning we scanned and printed a negative on OHP. Except for a dithering problem on his printer (since corrected I understand) it was an amazing print. Good open shadows and delicate highlights. It was not the final version, but that was having to modify the image in PS, not the curve.

We did another print with sky, and while grainy in the sky it was no worse than if I had used TXP film! The graininess may have to do more with the printer and the OHP, The coating of the OHP has to be coarse enough to hold enough ink, and that may contribute to the grain (not noticible in alt. methods).

As soon as I clear some things off my plates I will be working it out for my 2400!

Mike

www.mprosenberg.com
 

mkochsch

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
206
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Black without K

M-- As you may be able to tell, I only know enough about QTR to make one set of actions work. I definitely do not know all the bells and whistles that are available in it. When I use Gray Curve to finalize tonal linearization I use paired numbers typed in between quotes. I believe you are right that gray curve can use a .acv curve. But, as I tried to explain in an earlier post to Helen Bach, to work for printing negatives the number pairs must first be transposed from positive space to negative space and then inverted. That is what I have done for the number pairs in all the QTR profiles I have posted here.
When I say seven inks, I am talking about the seven Ultrachrome inks used by my Epson 4000 (and by the 2200 as well) Matte Black, Light Black, Cyan, Light Cyan, Magenta, Light Magenta, and Yellow.

Ron Reeder

I'm struggling with the decision as to how to start my ink setup if I'm not using either Black (K) or Light Black (Lt. K) in my workflow since most examples I've seen always use the K or Lt. K as the primary starting colour.

For example, should I use C, M, Y in "Gray Ink" mode and then use "Copy Curve From" mode on Lt. C and Lt. M to point those inks at C and M respectively? Maybe I should just use Yellow as my "Gray Ink" and then curve from there with the others?

When I do my linearization for OHP should I apply the same ACV file to the three primaries? How? Will applying it just once in the "Gray Curve" tab do the same to all three primaries?
 

Ron-san

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
154
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
4x5 Format
I'm struggling with the decision as to how to start my ink setup if I'm not using either Black (K) or Light Black (Lt. K) in my workflow since most examples I've seen always use the K or Lt. K as the primary starting colour.

For example, should I use C, M, Y in "Gray Ink" mode and then use "Copy Curve From" mode on Lt. C and Lt. M to point those inks at C and M respectively? Maybe I should just use Yellow as my "Gray Ink" and then curve from there with the others?

When I do my linearization for OHP should I apply the same ACV file to the three primaries? How? Will applying it just once in the "Gray Curve" tab do the same to all three primaries?
mkochsch -- I am certain there are many ways of obtaining your goal. I append a profile I recently wrote for the Epson 4000 showing how I solved the problem.
First, I also was leery of turning off the K and LK inks. So I left them turned on. For the LK ink, I let its amount be determined by the Default Ink limit, since I think I need its density in the less dense parts of the negative, and because these tones control the shadows of the print where I cannot believe using LK causes any perceptible increase in grainines.
For the K ink I left it turned on but set its individual ink limit rather low. Thus, its distribution can serve as a pattern for other inks, but it is turned so low I doubt very much it makes any contribution to graininess.
The rest of the inks I let be controlled by the default ink limit.
To linearize this profile I turned off the Gray Curve and played with the Default Ink limit until I had the contrast of the negative set. Then I played with Gray shadow, highlight, and gamma to get the final print tones roughly linear. Then I turned Gray curve back on and completed the process of linearization. As far as I know gray curve applies to the overall tones of the print, regardless of which inks are being used.
If I were using a printer with the K3 inkset I would do just as above except I would turn off the LLK ink. Its effect primarily in print shadows and I dont think it is worth fooling with for digital negatives.
Cheers, Ron Reeder
 

Kees

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
36
Format
35mm
mkochsch -- I am certain there are many ways of obtaining your goal. I append a profile I recently wrote for the Epson 4000 showing how I solved the problem.
Cheers, Ron Reeder

Ron, what color does your negative have with this profile? When you use a partitioned workflow for K and LK, C and LC, M and LM and not for Y, because there is no light Y, the negative gets a CM hue in the lighter tones I noticed. This might be more visible whithout K and LK. One way to get a more neutral BW print is by not partitioning and copy_curve the same curve for every color.

Attached is an example file to explain what I am doing. I think the LK can indeed be added without any problem. This gives a higher overal density. To change the hue of the negative it is possible to take down ink limits for each individual color or pairs of colors.

regards,

kees
 

Ron-san

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
154
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
4x5 Format
Ron, what color does your negative have with this profile? When you use a partitioned workflow for K and LK, C and LC, M and LM and not for Y, because there is no light Y, the negative gets a CM hue in the lighter tones I noticed. This might be more visible whithout K and LK. One way to get a more neutral BW print is by not partitioning and copy_curve the same curve for every color.

Attached is an example file to explain what I am doing. I think the LK can indeed be added without any problem. This gives a higher overal density. To change the hue of the negative it is possible to take down ink limits for each individual color or pairs of colors.

regards,

kees
Kees--
Currently my negs are a purple shading to green color. Fact is, though, I do not care what color they are. I want enough density to make a neg that will print on palladium (no problem with either the Ultrachrome or K3 inks) and I want the smoothest tone I can get. I definitely know that printing with many inks rather than just the K and LK inks gives a smoother tone. So I tend to toss them all in. Whether there is an advantage of leaving K out altogether -- has anyone done the experiment in a definitive fashion?
As for the Y ink, as you can see from the profile, I just copy the K distribution curve onto the Y ink and that seems to work well.
That said, thank you for showing me how to turn off the K ink altogether. If I ever decide I need to do that, I will be able to do so.
The beauty of the QTR approach is that you can make the inks do essentially anything you can think of.
Thanks for the post. Ron Reeder
 

mkochsch

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
206
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Something's wrong with the Windows version of QTR -- maybe. I bring in these files and they work OK if I don't open them with the curve creator but as soon as I do all the "copy curve = C" gets changed to K or Lt K. Hmm. In fact anytime I try to make a No K profile it changes back to K from whatever I've set the copy curve to. I think possibly an incompatibility between OS's. Anyone else trying to use the Windows version experiencing these issues?
 

mkochsch

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Messages
206
Location
Winnipeg, Canada
Giving Up For Now

I'm experiencing mounting obstacles in my quest to integrate QuadToneRip into my digital negative workflow:

These are the minor ones:
- No "Negative" function.
- No "Mirror" function.
- Bugs in the QIDF file in Windows causing Curve Creator settings to import wrong settings. (I can get around this bug by changing the setting in Curve Creator, clicking "Create Curve" and then never opening the QIDF file ever again,if I do, I have to input the setting again. Annoying bug. Not a deal breaker though).

Now the bad one:
Dithering and/or media advance in the driver are causing banding issues on OHP. I did several tests sending the 21Step.tif to the printer using QuadToneRip and using the Epson Driver on Pictorico OHP. The result show me that the Epson driver is unmatched when using PhotoRPM, High Speed OFF, SuperMicroWeave ON. To me it looks like there's a hiccup happening in QTR print driver or it needs some updating. This problem probably goes unnoticed by the majority of users since they are printing positives to paper and the eye's ability to see anomolies in the shadows isn't as acute as it is when your looking at the highlights. However when printing a digital negative it shows up quickly to those who know what to look for. (I used a film scanner of the step wedges to examine the dot pattern. Banding or Ventian Blinds, call them what you will, are very obvious).
Incidentally, I did manage a "Black without K". So partial success. I had to turn the main ink limit down to 25% before the pooling finally let up on the pictorico anything higher than that there were problems. You should have seen the first print at 100 %. Ink literally running off the page.
My best density was recorded as log 1.4 du BTW. A little under 4.5 stops. Maybe usable for some but not all processes. I never bothered to test for UV density as the banding issuing basically sunk my will to continue. If there is a way to fix this I'd be happy to give it a go again.
 

Ron-san

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
154
Location
Seattle, WA
Format
4x5 Format
I'm experiencing mounting obstacles in my quest to integrate QuadToneRip into my digital negative workflow:
If there is a way to fix this I'd be happy to give it a go again.
mkochsch-- I feel your pain. I am sorry that I am not much help with the PC specific problems (being one of the Mac crowd, you know). Are you aware of the Yahoo chat group dedicated to QTR problems? Go to the Quadtone RIP overview web page and click on Support. Maybe someone in that group can help. Good luck, Ron Reeder
 
OP
OP
donbga

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Hi Kees,
Did you make your own QTR curves too? When you download QTR there is a Curvedesign folder included.

After installing the latest version of QTR for Windows XP there wasn't a Curvedesign folder or a PSD version of the inkseperation file.

After printing the inseperation file through the QTR Calibration Mode twice I realized that I needed to rename the file named inkseperation7.tif to inkseperation.tif.

If I am reading between the lines here, the PSD version of the inkseperation file may allow the image to be altered printing only specific colors or combination of colors to determine specific color/ink limits.

The green (CY) negatives have most contrast, Magenta-Yellow (MY) has a bit less contrast and purple CM is low contrast. You can mix in some extra yellow or magenta to finetune from the driver where you can choose two profiles and mix them.

Thanks for the info.

Here is an example of my CM inkdescriptor file: CM.txt
I use the normal ink description for the first inkcolor and the toner description position for the other.

Maybe a windows QTR user can tell if this works the same on windows.
Hope this gets you on the way!

kees

Thanks for the descriptor file. It should be interesting to pick through.

Don Bryant
 
OP
OP
donbga

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Something's wrong with the Windows version of QTR -- maybe. I bring in these files and they work OK if I don't open them with the curve creator but as soon as I do all the "copy curve = C" gets changed to K or Lt K. Hmm. In fact anytime I try to make a No K profile it changes back to K from whatever I've set the copy curve to. I think possibly an incompatibility between OS's. Anyone else trying to use the Windows version experiencing these issues?

Hi Michael,

I read all through this thread tonight following the discussion again from my first reading.

Now reading your post again the thought occured to me that if these files posted by Ron and Kees were saved on a Mac, could there be a little endian, big endian miss match causing your problem?

I've not tried looking at these profiles myself but just thought I would pass my thoughts along, though I could be completely wrong.

Don Bryant
 

mprosenberg

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Messages
27
Don,

I know you meant the other Michael :smile:... But you can open the Max file, which is a text, in the QTRgui and it will convert it to a .qidf profile when you save it. Also, the curve creator in the gui is a tab, and you can cut and paste the .txt file line created on the mac version directly into the space in that tab. You can open the created .qidf file directly in MS word, modify it, and reload it in QTRgui. Or you can send the file to a Mac user and they can open it as a txt file and use it in QTR.

There are some options available in the gui it seems that are not apparent when you open the file as a txt file in PC or Mac. For example, there are tone curves one and two, which can be ignored. The graphing features of the gui make it very useful for gauging how changes would affect your negative.


Mike
 
OP
OP
donbga

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
But you can open the Max file, which is a text, in the QTRgui and it will convert it to a .qidf profile when you save it.

For some reason I thought the file M. Schulte mentioned was a binary file.

Also, the curve creator in the gui is a tab, and you can cut and paste the .txt file line created on the mac version directly into the space in that tab. You can open the created .qidf file directly in MS word, modify it, and reload it in QTRgui. Or you can send the file to a Mac user and they can open it as a txt file and use it in QTR.

Yes I'm familiar with the interface having made/modified curves for ink jet printing previously.

There are some options available in the gui it seems that are not apparent when you open the file as a txt file in PC or Mac. For example, there are tone curves one and two, which can be ignored. The graphing features of the gui make it very useful for gauging how changes would affect your negative.
Mike

I'm still curious to find out meaning of the reference to the inkseperation.psd file mentioned in the QTR Tutorial and by Kees. Is this something missing in the PC distribution?

I printed the ink seperation file last night on three substrates with PK and MK inks. I assume that choosing the correct ink limit setting for making digital negatives will be different than choosing an ink limit for inkjet prints. The ink limit choosen for printing digital negatives would be the setting that produces paper white when printing the the 21 step tablet at the minimum printing time. Picking that setting seems to be a process of trial and error. Choose an ink limit number and see if it works.

BTW, the African Chruch on Sapelo, Is. that you have an interior shot of on your web site not longer exists like it was. The chruch has been entirely restored.

Don Bryant
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mprosenberg

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Messages
27
Don,

That is amazing that they restored the church. It was amazing when I photographed it - I photographed it on December 29th 1999. My girlfriend (now wife) and I stayed at LuLu's trailer and rented a car from them. It was a remarkable couple of days. Do you know when they restored it? The back end was falling off, and the porch had caved in.

Mike
 
OP
OP
donbga

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Don,

That is amazing that they restored the church. It was amazing when I photographed it - I photographed it on December 29th 1999. My girlfriend (now wife) and I stayed at LuLu's trailer and rented a car from them. It was a remarkable couple of days. Do you know when they restored it? The back end was falling off, and the porch had caved in.

Mike

I can't remember when it was restored but the last time I visited it had been completely restored with the help of The Savanah Historical Society. I've stayed at Lulu's also, renting a car too and I've also stayed at the Reynolds mansion several times. Much better digs, food, and transportation, but more expensive. It would make a great place to host a field workshop for photography.

Hog Hammock is changing too. The land is being slowly sold to developers and new homes are being built. The old society there is dying out and the heirs want to cash in on the land value.

Don Bryant
 

mprosenberg

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2002
Messages
27
Don,

I am sorry to hear that. I knew that developers had been trying to buy up the land, and that there was great resistance, but I guess it is hard to resist the money. I am trying to remember the name of the photographer from Texas who had photographed (with 4x5) there - both the people and the land. He printed on Forte warm tone, and the prints were gorgeous.

Maybe we should try to have a free workshop there before there is too much more change. In any case I will have to try to go there this Feb. and photograph.

Mike
 
OP
OP
donbga

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Don,

I am trying to remember the name of the photographer from Texas who had photographed (with 4x5) there - both the people and the land. He printed on Forte warm tone, and the prints were gorgeous.

Sorry I don't know the photographers name. I may have seen the work but can't bring it to mind now.

Maybe we should try to have a free workshop there before there is too much more change. In any case I will have to try to go there this Feb. and photograph.
Mike

February and March have always been very cold for me on the Georgia coast. Maybe late March or early April. Actually any time it is warm or hot is fine with me.

Like I said the Reynold's mansion would be a really cool place to have a workshop but expensive. The state also requires at least 20 people now to lease the mansion for a week. The staff is great, the food is really good, access to the interior of the mansion and grounds is unrestricted and there are two large vans at the groups disposal with all the gas they can use. Rental bikes are also available. Reservations usually have to be made 1 year in advance. It's been about 4 years since I've been down so I wouldn't mind going back.

Don
 

wiz

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
54
Hi,

We talked about using QTR for digital negatives and I noticed that there are four (or maybe more) different approaches. I am trying to list them here:
Ah, a subject dear to my heart... I'll expand on this a bit.
1. QTR BW workflow with quad black inks

This is what QTR was made for. You have to use a dedicated printer with black and grey inks or one of the newer K3 printers. Third party inksets are sold by MIS or Cone and others.

Each grey ink overlaps the previous and this can be controlled in the inkdescriptor file. A no K, only grey, approach is also possible. Process related density range can be controlled by setting ink limits. Process related correction/linearization curves can be specified in the gray_curve setting or applied in photoshop. (Note: does QTR handle these curves in 16 bit? If not, it is probably better to keep using them in photoshop on 16bit files)
Yes, QTR handles the curves in a better than 8 bit fashion, although if memory serves, it's 14 bit, to allow some overhead.

Part of the "power" of the quad black approach is that it largely addresses most of the banding and dither issues some folks have been experiencing. Another part is that it allows you to run high ink levels on all the blacks and grays, and that "fills in" the gaps between dots. "negative" dots (gaps between black or dark gray dots) print as black speckles in what should be the lighter tones, and are incredibly annoying.

Another important advantage is that the carbon black inks have virtually the same density to UV as they do to visible light, just like a regular silver negative. So densitometers and sensiometric curves work. Because the density is the same to blue and green light, multi-grade papers work with their normal filtration.

And the last important advantage is that you can "read" these negatives. I've worked with all those weird "multchromic" negatives, and they just are so much work to visualize.

My own workflow uses five dilutions of black for digital negatives on one of my Epson 2200 machines. It's loaded with an inkset I call "Wiz7" (I have a tendency to name things after myself).

100% MIS "Eboni" for matte black
100% MIS PKN ("neutral" photo black, cooler than Epson's photo black)
32% PKN
10% PKN
3.2% PKN
1% PKN
MIS "glop" (a clear varnish that can be used to fill in the uninked areas of a B&W print, or applied to the whole print as an "overcoat").

For digital negatives, I print with the 5 dilutions of PKN.

For glossy prints, 5 PKN and glop

For matte prints, Eboni and 5 PKN. (Eboni for density from about 1.7 to 1.3, 100% PKN for 1.3 to 1.0, etc...)

I'm considering loading an 1800 with 8 dilutions of PKN, 100, 56, 32, 23, 10, 5.6, 3.2, and 2.3% as a dedicated negative machine. Between the smaller 1800 dot size and the extra blacks between my normal 5 "root 10" blacks, the negatives should be the best thing out there.

2. QTR BW workflow with K and LK in a printer with color inks.

As I understand Ron correctly, and after looking at his 2200 Pd and silver sample files, in his workflow only K and LK are used in combination with ink limit settings for density range control. All other inks are not used by specifying them as 'unused' or setting inklimits to zero. As an only grey approach it is not very different from the first approach but it uses only two inks.
A quite satisfactory approach, although it will result in more white speckles in light tones on the print.
3. QTR BW workflow with all (color) inks.

This workflow uses all inks with or without K an LK to print a BW negative with all inks. Default ink limit settings control negative densitity range.
Ron's earlier example files are using copy_curve to copy and set values for each color. But individual values for each ink after measuring the inkseparation print can be set in the descriptor file also.
This will work a lot better if you print a QTR calibration pattern, print that pattern onto platinum, and use it to determine the ink order based ont eh UV blocking ability of each of the colors of Epson ink. The resultant negative will look very strange, but it will work very well. As I recall, full strength magenta falls in between K and LK and "fixes" the speckles in light tones quite well.
4. QTR colorized negatives

This is a different approach and maybe combines the best of two worlds. Here the process related density range is achieved by spectral density and finetuned by ink limit settings. For each CMY color and/or two color combinations CM, CY, MY a monochrome QTR profile is made. All other inks are set to unused. CY gives a high contrast range suitable for long scale processes like salt or albumen printing. CM gives a low contrast suitable for gum printing. Contrast control and finetuning can be done by mixing two QTR-curves or by taking down inklimits (or both).
OK, this one I've honestly not seen before.

Since QTR dithers in more than 8 bits, I'd expect QTR results using just K and LK with curves built for long or short scales to exceed its performance by a wide margin.
This method would work even better with a ternary CMY calibration file of some sort to choose the right color for each process.

What approach gives the best results is difficult to say. When density range has to be very long, a spectral density negative might be the way to go.

To get the smoothest negative possible probably asks for a print with as many inks as possible. Inks that behave differently (K) than others (colors, greys) can be problematic so an 'all colors, no K' BW approach might be interesting. When using K2 K3 inksets a toner color can be mixed in for density range control.

And there's allways the printing substrate that has a big influence on the density range and smoothness of the negative. Different printers and inksets of course too.
That's an understatement.

Have fun.
 
OP
OP
donbga

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Whiz,

Another important advantage is that the carbon black inks have virtually the same density to UV as they do to visible light, just like a regular silver negative. So densitometers and sensiometric curves work. Because the density is the same to blue and green light, multi-grade papers work with their normal filtration.

So why is this important? Are you suggesting that you will change the filtration once a specific curve is calibrated for a specific contrast setting?

And the last important advantage is that you can "read" these negatives. I've worked with all those weird "multchromic" negatives, and they just are so much work to visualize.

Why do they need to be "read" at all? The negative is going to be contact printed for a specific time with no dodging and burning.

My own workflow uses five dilutions of black for digital negatives on one of my Epson 2200 machines. It's loaded with an inkset I call "Wiz7" (I have a tendency to name things after myself).

100% MIS "Eboni" for matte black
100% MIS PKN ("neutral" photo black, cooler than Epson's photo black)
32% PKN
10% PKN
3.2% PKN
1% PKN
MIS "glop" (a clear varnish that can be used to fill in the uninked areas of a B&W print, or applied to the whole print as an "overcoat").

For digital negatives, I print with the 5 dilutions of PKN.

For glossy prints, 5 PKN and glop

It sounds to me that you are make printing digital negatives and ink jet prints way too complicated.

This will work a lot better if you print a QTR calibration pattern, print that pattern onto platinum, and use it to determine the ink order based ont eh UV blocking ability of each of the colors of Epson ink. The resultant negative will look very strange, but it will work very well. As I recall, full strength magenta falls in between K and LK and "fixes" the speckles in light tones quite well.

I've thought of printing the ink seperation test to determine the UV blocking when printed by QTR. Can you explain what you mean by ink order?

Don Bryant
 

wiz

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
54
Don,

I'll assume you meant no insult, but a "wiz" is someone who's good at something. Short for a "wizard". Around here, to "whiz" is to urinate.
So why is this important? Are you suggesting that you will change the filtration once a specific curve is calibrated for a specific contrast setting?
Exactly. Because densitometers don't tell the whole story. You may get your curves perfect, whether it's with densitometers, software like PDN, or lots of work, like Burkholder, and get a print with a great match to the screen, or a great match to your vision. Then you put it in a different light, or put it behind glass (you have any idea how much DMAX glass steals?) and you decide you need to boodt or decrease the contrast.

Or because paper changes from batch to batch, or you want to try a different brand of paper. And developer depletes during a printing session, increasing developing time to compensate changes contrast, and a change of filtration can bring you back on spec.

There's also the issue that, because the two layers of multigrade papers are sensitive to different colors, negatives with grays made up of multiple color inks "speckle" more than negatives with pure carbon black inks.
Why do they need to be "read" at all? The negative is going to be contact printed for a specific time with no dodging and burning.
Again, because you may change dang near any part of the process, and the ability to read a negative can tell you "hey, though I created this negative for multigrade, it looks like it may also work for lith", or "that one I made for AZO is never going to work for platinum, have to make a separate one for that process..."
It sounds to me that you are make printing digital negatives and ink jet prints way too complicated.
Maybe so, but what I'm doing works pretty well for me, my customers like it, and my students like it.

And, if you read Phil's post here about giving up on digital negatives and gelatin prints because of speckled light tones, you'd see that sometimes it does take a bit of work to get the results you want...
I've thought of printing the ink seperation test to determine the UV blocking when printed by QTR. Can you explain what you mean by ink order?
Once you've printed the chart, you can then look at each ink as a different shade of gray. You just look at your darkroom print to determine ink is the darkest (which will be photo black) then the next darkest (probably cyan) and so on, setting QTR up as if it were a seven shade of gray set, following the directions in the QTR manual for building a profile. The trick is to invert the print densities, because QTR isn't designed for negatives, and you have to make the profile generator think you've got positives...
 

wiz

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2006
Messages
54
Another important advantage is that the carbon black inks have virtually the same density to UV as they do to visible light, just like a regular silver negative. So densitometers and sensiometric curves work. Because the density is the same to blue and green light, multi-grade papers work with their normal filtration.
So why is this important? Are you suggesting that you will change the filtration once a specific curve is calibrated for a specific contrast setting?
One other reason why it's "important"...

Because I have a little spreadsheet that contains a table of the negative density values of my QTR curves (2200 with my inks, 4000 and 7600 with stock Epson inks) and allows me to input the sensiometric (negative density to print density) curves for any paper/developer combination. It then spits out a new QTR curve to go from a gamma 2.2 positive to that particular paper/ink combination. I can read the sensiometric curve right out of a paper manufacturer's data sheets, or print a good old Stoffer 31 step wedge and pop the densities into the spreadsheet (it curve fits any number of densities)

So, develop one QTR curve per printer/ink/substrate for a good, smooth negative scale, one sensiometric curve per paper/chemistry combination, and can generate a negative on any machine for any paper. Get a new printer? Run one QTR profiling procedure to set new ink limits, linearize, and feed the densities into the spreadsheet and "poof", I've got fully functional curves for 15 darkroom processes. Decide to try argyotype? Print one Stoffen wedge, measure it, and I've got fully functional curves for all three printers.
 
OP
OP
donbga

donbga

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2003
Messages
3,053
Format
Large Format Pan
Joe,
I'll assume you meant no insult, but a "wiz" is someone who's good at something. Short for a "wizard". Around here, to "whiz" is to urinate.

An unconcious typo.

There's also the issue that, because the two layers of multigrade papers are sensitive to different colors, negatives with grays made up of multiple color inks "speckle" more than negatives with pure carbon black inks.

I prefer to use graded papers to eliminate the problem of colorized negatives.

Again, because you may change dang near any part of the process, and the ability to read a negative can tell you "hey, though I created this negative for multigrade, it looks like it may also work for lith", or "that one I made for AZO is never going to work for platinum, have to make a separate one for that process..."

That is one of the short comings of digital negs.

Since you mentioned students, seems like I recall that you mentioned on Photo.net that you have a book about printing digital negatives. If so is it available?

Thanks,

Don Bryant
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom