Pushing PanF+

Kentmere 200 Film Test

A
Kentmere 200 Film Test

  • 2
  • 1
  • 6
Full Saill Dancer

A
Full Saill Dancer

  • 0
  • 0
  • 54
Elena touching the tree

A
Elena touching the tree

  • 6
  • 6
  • 137
Graveyard Angel

A
Graveyard Angel

  • 8
  • 2
  • 115
Norfolk coastal path.

A
Norfolk coastal path.

  • 3
  • 4
  • 142

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,767
Messages
2,763,936
Members
99,463
Latest member
Antaras
Recent bookmarks
0

zenrhino

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2004
Messages
699
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Format
Medium Format
Does PanF+ push well at all?

I've got Ilfosol S and whatever Freestyles "Arista" developer is, and could stop and get some Rodinal if need be.

Thanks!
 

MikeK

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
556
Location
Walnut Creek
Format
Large Format
My only concern with pushing Pan F would be the increase in contrast. As really you are under exposing and over developing. Pam F is a slow film and doubling the speed you are going to get an EI of between 64 and 100.

Personally I think you would be better served with using a 100 or 400 speed film and processing normally.

- Mike
 

Flotsam

Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Messages
3,221
Location
S.E. New Yor
I agree with Mike. I have enough problems fighting to get decent shadow detail with Pan F at 50. With some developers I even have to under-rate it. It would probably be better to use a faster film and save the Pan F for what it does best.
 

papagene

Membership Council
Council
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
5,435
Location
Tucson, AZ
Format
Multi Format
I also agree with Mike and Neal. Unless it was an emergency and you had to push PanF, why do so purposely? FP4+, Plus X, HP5+ and Tri-X are better suited for higher ISO's.

gene
 

felipemorgan

Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2004
Messages
91
Location
Portland, OR
Format
Medium Format
On pp. 53-54 of the "Film Developing Cookbook," Anchell and Troop discuss using a slow film like Pan F+ at double the rated speed in the Beutler developer http://www.jackspcs.com/fdnb.htm. I have tried this combination (Pan F+ at ASA100 with the Beutler developer) and found that the resulting negatives print well with shadows that are present, but probably not as "luminous" (pushed out of the toe region on to the straight line of the film curve) as some are wanting.

So whether Pan F+ "pushes well" depends upon what results you want. But I have gotten printable, satisfying results at ASA100 with the above combination.

Good luck!

--Philip.

zenrhino said:
Does PanF+ push well at all?

I've got Ilfosol S and whatever Freestyles "Arista" developer is, and could stop and get some Rodinal if need be.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP

zenrhino

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2004
Messages
699
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Format
Medium Format
papagene said:
I also agree with Mike and Neal. Unless it was an emergency and you had to push PanF, why do so purposely? FP4+, Plus X, HP5+ and Tri-X are better suited for higher ISO's.

gene

Thats it exactly. I grabbed my rolls of PanF+ instead of HP5+.

Oopsie.

But after about 20 exposures in -30 deg F. windchill I decided it was too cold to shoot, so no worries. =)
 

TPPhotog

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
3,041
Format
Multi Format
Zen If you pull the HP5+ to 200 it's interesting how similar it looks to Pan F imo.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom