Processing K-12

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 10
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 3
  • 0
  • 35
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 40
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 32
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 36

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,897
Messages
2,782,706
Members
99,741
Latest member
likes_life
Recent bookmarks
0

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Hello,

Pulled a roll of Kodachrome II K-12 from my new Argus C-3 today. I understand that I can process this as a black and white film only nowadays. Anything I should know before I just throw it into some HC-110? I don't need slides. Negs are fine.

The camera itself is very sweet. In excellent condition with never-ready case, flash, cased Weston meter, and original box. And all for...FREE. :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Any normal B&W developer will bring out the silver image, of course. Then you need a way to remove the remjet backing. This page might be useful: http://lavender.fortunecity.com/lavender/569/k12bwnegdev.html

Good luck, and let us know how it turns out! Show scans if possible!

Thanks for the info.

Why would a still film have a remjet coating, though? The guy in the link is writing about motion picture film, if I read it correctly. Same theory, but the roll I have should not have a remjet backing.
 

E76

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
401
Location
Baltimore, MD
Format
Medium Format
I believe all Kodachrome film, motion picture or not, has a remjet backing. Was the base side of the film black? If so, there's a good chance it has remjet applied.
 
OP
OP

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
Cool. Thanks, all. I will either use my D-19 or my Ilford PQ, both of which are already in hand, and let you know what happens.

I am interested in hearing more about remjet removal, however. One guy sez do it before, and another guy sez do it after. What has worked for y'all?
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
97
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
As others have said, all Kodachrome films, still and movie, has remjet. The reasons are probably mostly historical.
I am interested in hearing more about remjet removal, however. One guy sez do it before, and another guy sez do it after. What has worked for y'all?
In normal Kodachrome processing, remjet removal is the first step. I wouldn't try to do it that way though, since it needs to be done in complete darkness and you'd have no way to see if you're getting everything off. After processing, when the film is wet, the backing ought to come off pretty easily, and you can see what you're doing.
 

David Grenet

Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2007
Messages
309
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Multi Format
While I don't have any experience in this, my understanding is that if you don't remove the remjet backing first it will come off in the developer and potentially stick to the emulsion.

I'd remove it first...
 

nickandre

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
1,918
Location
Seattle WA
Format
Medium Format
First use a bath of one teaspoon sodium sulfite per liter to soften the remjet, then rinse/agitate or remove it with a cloth in the dark. You are better off reversing it because the film contains a yellow filter made of silver which will only go away if bleached. You will have a hard time printing the negatives on most materials.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom