My 67 65mm and 90mm both have rotating depth of field scales, non floating blads lenses don't? A
specific and seductive problem. There is no indication that the 65 has a floating group and some don't (supposedly) my manual does not clarify latter case. My 65 lens group moves so I know it is floating...
Is your degree in sophistry?
-sophists always put a false phrase at front to permit their false hood argument. Politicians do this too.
I've used mine P&S 55mm preset to /5.6 and 6 foot. Lots of early 20th century press and candid shots were medium format or larger, indeed back then 120 was regarded as a minature camera film by some.
I would expect that it is the lens manual that describes how it works, not the camera manual.
With regards to your nasty question, no I do not have a degree in sophistry and I am not a politician.
On the other hand you seem to be one as you put words in my mouth. I never said that it was stupid to download the manual, you said it. You also claimed that the camera is difficult to operate yet when asked specifically you move the subject from the back to the lens, then the tubes, etc. You also said it is easy to take photos on the backing paper yet never explained how this can be done. It is all there for everyone to read.
Anyway, I do not find the RB67 complicated to use, certainly no more complicated than a Hasselblad or other medium format cameras. On the other hand you present yourself as someone who is seriously challenged by it. Fair enough but you shouldn't hold it against me that I can see the obvious.
So let's just leave it at that and a good day to you sir.
Last edited by a moderator: