• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Presoak or not?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,745
Messages
2,829,486
Members
100,924
Latest member
hilly
Recent bookmarks
0

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Waaaay back before the digital takeover in commercial photography.. the 1980s, I worked in a commercial studio and a Kodak rep was always near by if not lurking around. They gave out info and recommendations and did research on questions all the time. It was one of those guys who told me that Kodak recommends 2 minutes presoak on Tmax films. It was also a rep who told me then that D76 was actually the best developer for Tmax films but they had introduced "Tmax Developer" as a response to photographers who wished for a special new developer. He said it still wasn't better than D76. Of course that is just one Kodak Rep standing around talking and it might be a matter of opinion.

You are actually closer to the truth than what anyone else has posted on all of these topics. :D

I'm glad I didn't say it. :D

PE
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Agitation is used to break the bubbles that form on the surface of film as it wets.

It is also used for the sake of uniformity.

PE
 

Ronald Moravec

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
1,355
Location
Downers Grov
Ok so you are able to find some instructions from 1940. Lots of film technology has changed in 70 years.

Ilford specifly recommends against it for their products saying it washes out chemicals that promoted even and fast developer absorbtion.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Ok so you are able to find some instructions from 1940. Lots of film technology has changed in 70 years.

Ilford specifly recommends against it for their products saying it washes out chemicals that promoted even and fast developer absorbtion.

Ronald;

You think that I am unaware of the changes? I took part in making them happen for 32 years. I pointed out in my post that the use of a water wash after development was changed to use of a stop bath. When a change is made, I take note of it.

The Kodak example is done with 120 film as an example, but they imply its use for their daylight loading tank.

I'm aware of what Ilford says as well. I said I do both and I do. I get good results from my Ilford film with their process recommendations, but I use a prewet. I have clearly stated my reasons in all of my posts.

The statement was made that "no manufacturer recommends a prewet" and my answer was the original Kodak B&W instruction booklet. I can cite the Jobo manuals as well. My point throughout my posts was that there is little difference except for better uniformity. I've pointed out my reasoning and actually done it under controlled lab conditions.

Have you?

PE
 

wirehead

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
172
Format
Medium Format
Hrm. So I dug out my 1943 "How to make good pictures" by Kodak (complete with the note at the beginning that Kodak is very busy with the special production of urgently needed war material and suggests that you make every shot count) and found that they do, in fact, recommend no stop and a pre-wet.

But I see that Ron's beat me to it.
 

Snapshot

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
For those that advocate a pre-soak, it sounds like it will have some benefit for non-dilute developers, allowing for more even development. It is, however, not much benefit for dilute developers, right?
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
For those that advocate a pre-soak, it sounds like it will have some benefit for non-dilute developers, allowing for more even development. It is, however, not much benefit for dilute developers, right?

You are exactly correct!

I will repeat though "use what works for you". That is the final criterion in all photographic work as there are too many variables for just one answer.

PE
 

Snapshot

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
913
Location
Toronto, Ont
Format
Multi Format
You are exactly correct!

I will repeat though "use what works for you". That is the final criterion in all photographic work as there are too many variables for just one answer.

PE
Thanks for confirming what I read in this thread. I'll give pre-soak a try for my D-76 and FX-37 developers.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom