I wholly agree with Bill, but would like to add a twist to it. It has been very common for me, lately, to go shooting with another photographer. I find that it becomes a different experience, but not necessarily worse.
When I go on my own, which I love, I can take all the time I want with a certain subject, and I can just sit and take things in until I'm sure about what I want to do.
However, when I'm with another photographer, even if you photograph the same subject matter, there are two different brains interpreting it. An interesting comparison to make is the UK B&W magazine, where a couple of months ago Leon Taylor and another APUG subscriber who's name escapes me printed the same neg and compared their results. They were two completely different prints, from the same negative! If they were both using different cameras creating their own negatives, the difference might have been even larger!
I just think it's an excellent opportunity to learn from others and to grow to go out and burn film or excite pixels with others.
So, I don't favor either situation, I just think both ways are advantageous, each in their own way. I can't wait to see if I can make it to the APUG gathering on the Lake Superior North Shore in February, or the Michigan gathering at Schwab's in June. I also can't wait to explore those places on my own.
- Thomas
As someone who has spent many, many hours photographing alone, I love to go shooting from time to time with other people. Sure it can have its distractions, but I also find the conversation can be very stimulating when there is someone around that does what I do. It is not as if you are attached at the hip either. As long as you respect the other photographer's space and they respect yours, what's the problem? Just set your boundaries ahead of time and no one gets hurt.