PQ Universal vs Harman Warmtone developer??

Organ-ized

D
Organ-ized

  • 0
  • 0
  • 18
Ticket Window

A
Ticket Window

  • 3
  • 1
  • 80
Northbound

A
Northbound

  • 2
  • 1
  • 65

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,488
Messages
2,808,682
Members
100,278
Latest member
bigbusy
Recent bookmarks
0

jovo

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
4,120
Location
Jacksonville
Format
Multi Format
I've recently become enamored of Ilford's PQ Universal Developer (paper) after having used Ilford's Multigrade developer for years. I really like the warmer tonality it offers. Does anyone have any experience with PQ Universal and with Harman's Warmtone? Is the latter even warmer than the PQ? It's time to order more of something as I have a lot of printing to do for a show, and I'm looking for whatever will get me closer to Iford's Warmtone paper which I just can't afford. The paper I will use is Iford MGIV FB, btw. (Toning isn't quite right for the work I'm printing, although I admit to just starting to learn what I will want to know about that.)

Thanks for any help anyone can offer!
 

jmal

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
529
Location
Kansas
Format
35mm
I have not noticed any sigificant difference between the two. I do think the WT developer might be a bit softer if that makes sense. Additionally, I have only noticed a slight warming with MGWT paper. With MGIV, I feel like the prints just look slightly mushy. I'd stick with PQ unless you're really itching to experiment.
 
OP
OP
jovo

jovo

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
4,120
Location
Jacksonville
Format
Multi Format
Thanks, jmal. I've looked at two prints from the same negative developed in Multigrade, and PQ Universal respectively, and not noticed any mushiness, but I wasn't expecting any, so I might not have noticed it if it were very slight.
It is very helpful to read your evaluation of "not any significant difference " between PQ and Warmtone though. Thanks again.

Is anyone else familiar with these two?
 

jmal

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
529
Location
Kansas
Format
35mm
Just to clarify, the mushiness was with Harman WT dev and MGIV paper. I have not seen any mushiness with PQ or MG dev on any paper. Hope I did not confuse things.
 

AlanC

Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2004
Messages
348
Location
North Yorksh
I tried PQ once in comparison with Neutol WA, on Ilford Mgd 4 Fibre, and found that the Neutol WA gave slightly deeper blacks and slightly more contrast. Not a definitive test, but enough to put me off PQ.

Alan Clark
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
I've used ID-72, which may be similar. It gives very good, warm tones with warmtone paper.
 

Colin Corneau

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
2,365
Location
Winnipeg MB Canada
Format
35mm RF
If you just can't get the Ilford paper, I'd expend some energy looking into toning.

It's not hard, and does give a unique look to a print. It also increases the archival qualities, if you use selenium.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,321
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I've used ID-72, which may be similar. It gives very good, warm tones with warmtone paper.

ID-72 is the PQ variant of ID19/D19b and is probably more contrasty than PQ universal. ID-62 is closer, with no Benzotriazole & additional bromide it become ID-78 which is very similar to Neutol WA.

Ian
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom