• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Post your street photography here

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
203,301
Messages
2,852,673
Members
101,770
Latest member
geoffreynt
Recent bookmarks
0
make one for me too...
I think you will be far happier with the real thing.
I made a 6x12 with a 90mm lens, but its not very discrete, then again, Ive used a Mamiya rz out and about on the street and that ways a ton and is like a canon going off.
Wouldn't be too hard to adapt a medium format to a double frame 35mm, sure theres a DIY youtube vid somewhere.
 
I think you will be far happier with the real thing.
I made a 6x12 with a 90mm lens, but its not very discrete, then again, Ive used a Mamiya rz out and about on the street and that ways a ton and is like a canon going off.
Wouldn't be too hard to adapt a medium format to a double frame 35mm, sure theres a DIY youtube vid somewhere.

the xpan is truly such a masterpiece. It will always be worth every penny. But that’s me. Some people can’t shoot the format.
 
15422166897_e7c688daa3_c.jpg


Roma
Leica M6, 50mm, Fuji Neopan 400, Kodak Xtol 1+1, 400 iso, 10 min, 20°C.
Printed: BERGGER Variable Contrast Neutral Glossy - FB 20x30cm
 
Wouldn't be too hard to adapt a medium format to a double frame 35mm, sure theres a DIY youtube vid somewhere.

Any 6x7 can duplicate the Xpan format just by loading 35mm into a 220 magazine. You can do this at any level of sophistication you like, from primitive (guessing at framing) to "wasn't it designed to do this?" level. An RB67, heavy and loud, will never pass for an Xpan, but I have a 90mm, and can (over time) afford a 65 and 50 (which will nearly duplicate the lens range the Xpan can wear). And the camera has no electronics to fail without warning, doesn't even need a battery.
 
Any 6x7 can duplicate the Xpan format just by loading 35mm into a 220 magazine. You can do this at any level of sophistication you like, from primitive (guessing at framing) to "wasn't it designed to do this?" level. An RB67, heavy and loud, will never pass for an Xpan, but I have a 90mm, and can (over time) afford a 65 and 50 (which will nearly duplicate the lens range the Xpan can wear). And the camera has no electronics to fail without warning, doesn't even need a battery.
Just crop the 6x7 to an extreme horizontal. You will have the added bonus of more vertical leeway.
 
View attachment 247201

Roma
Leica M6, 50mm, Fuji Neopan 400, Kodak Xtol 1+1, 400 iso, 10 min, 20°C.
Printed: BERGGER Variable Contrast Neutral Glossy - FB 20x30cm
Those expressions are just priceless!
More summer moments from Edinburgh at festival time. Just going with the flow as the moment unfolds.
World In Motion, Edinburgh 3.jpg
 
Any 6x7 can duplicate the Xpan format just by loading 35mm into a 220 magazine. You can do this at any level of sophistication you like, from primitive (guessing at framing) to "wasn't it designed to do this?" level. An RB67, heavy and loud, will never pass for an Xpan, but I have a 90mm, and can (over time) afford a 65 and 50 (which will nearly duplicate the lens range the Xpan can wear). And the camera has no electronics to fail without warning, doesn't even need a battery.
Yes, seen the youtube vids, easy peasy. Still the xpan look like a sweet camera, way out of my price range though, which is roughly $100 for a 35mm camera, even if I sold off all my 35's be still struggling to get a down payment on one..
 
Just crop the 6x7 to an extreme horizontal. You will have the added bonus of more vertical leeway.
My little $5 Pentax Espio will crop your 35mm to that aspect ratio although resolution isnt very good......and its no good for Instagram.
02 06 19 fp4368 (2).jpg 02 06 19 fp4358 (2).jpg
And I like 1:2 ratio aswell.
23 08 19 ilford grade 2 glossy split toned delta 3200 in d76118 b.jpg
 
Those expressions are just priceless!
More summer moments from Edinburgh at festival time. Just going with the flow as the moment unfolds.
View attachment 247238
Great picture, love the bubbles.....think I see you in them, or that might be the drugs.
 
My little $5 Pentax Espio will crop your 35mm to that aspect ratio although resolution isnt very good......and its no good for Instagram.
And I like 1:2 ratio aswell.

If you mask your 6x7 to the standard 24 mm width, you're getting close to 3:1 (a true Xpan shoots 24x70, as I recall; if I mask the sprockets my RB67 does 24x67).

Those cheap "panoramic" point & shoots are a joke; they just mask down the standard 35mm frame, so instead of more image than 24x36, you're getting less (about 1/3 less).

Since I can't get (fresh) 220 film any more anyway, I like the idea of minor mods to a 220 film back to make the shots a $5000 Xpan would, with a camera I'll have about $1000 into by the time I have the lenses that (approximately) match the Xpan focal lengths -- and in a camera with no ticking time bomb in the form of electronics that are no longer repairable. Sure, it weighs as much as five Xpans -- but i can also shoot 6x4.5 and 6x7 with it, and mount lenses as long as 500 mm (not to mention the 37mm fisheye).
 
I recently updated my portfolio site with volume six in a diaristic series I call Flow. I don't post much about it anywhere because I'm not much into self-promotion, and because I know this kind of photography (which I'm a little loathe to call "street photography" for many of the same reasons that made Garry bristle) is not to everyone's taste.

I enjoy it. Maybe you will too, and I most definitely welcome your feedback!
 
Thanks for posting this Jason.
There is a lot I like on your site. I'm wondering how much of the connection I feel to some of the images is due to my familiarity with the location.
I have the same musings about Fred Herzog.
 
I recently updated my portfolio site with volume six in a diaristic series I call Flow. I don't post much about it anywhere because I'm not much into self-promotion, and because I know this kind of photography (which I'm a little loathe to call "street photography" for many of the same reasons that made Garry bristle) is not to everyone's taste.

I enjoy it. Maybe you will too, and I most definitely welcome your feedback!

Hi Jason,

As @MattKing said, a lot to like in your portfolio

I'm certainly no second coming of Cartier-Bresson or Garry Winogrand so take my comments with the appropriately sized grain of salt, but I have to say that I prefer your 'urban landscapes' to your photos that involve people on the street. I think that's partly because of how far away you are from the people in most of the photographs. I think the pictures would be much stronger if you could find a way to get closer (the old Robert Capa quote comes to mind) and if there was some sort of significant gesture somewhere in them. I realize it's difficult to do and I've struggled with that in my own photography, but getting closer really does make a world of difference.

Thanks for sharing your work with the forum.
 
Great picture, love the bubbles.....think I see you in them, or that might be the drugs.
Yes, you can see little reflections when you look really closely-I'm pleased I managed to get that.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom