- Joined
- Oct 8, 2006
- Messages
- 3,004
- Format
- Multi Format
Oh, wow, that's a powerful image.
Hair.Instax?
Hair.
NegativeI meant the film, not the scanning artifact.
@awty, what about the Fuji GW690 series?Pity Fuji dont do a 6x9 format.
I was referring to Instax film as referred to by Donald.
Ah, got it. I think the image area of Fuji instax wide is close to 6x9, and there's a new LomoGraflok 4×5 Instant Back:I was referring to Instax film as referred to by Donald.
Perhaps they can make instax in 6x9 and make a back for the GW690.
They do to! and I just remember I have one!Ah, got it. I think the image area of Fuji instax wide is close to 6x9, and there's a new LomoGraflok 4×5 Instant Back:
https://shop.lomography.com/en/lomo-graflok-instant-back
I just joined the forum and looking to start doing still lifes. In going through the gallery I was awed my your photography. Wonderful shot.View attachment 203713 RB67 using HP5 developed in DD-X. Touch up in Photoshop and toning in Lightroom.
Dolls are creepy even without makeup. Great looking bed, should get a nice patina out in the weather.
Doll, mirror and brass bed (Teddy, too) Fuji Velvia 100F, Pentax MX. late 2019. Camera-scan with post-processing in Lightroom.
nothing less than excellent.
Doll, mirror and brass bed (Teddy, too) Fuji Velvia 100F, Pentax MX. late 2019. Camera-scan with post-processing in Lightroom.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?