Kilgallb
Subscriber
Those of us who have had the privilege and pleasure of visiting this place could use a few photos at a time like this.
Those of us who have had the privilege and pleasure of visiting this place could use a few photos at a time like this.
I would be real surprised if the building was NOT insured. So, no, no money to the Pope from me. I am also sure the Catholic Church could pay for this if it were not insured.And spend just 1$ in addition - would you agree?
with regards
PS : I first have to scan some nice shots - but I will give some bucks in advance!!!!!!!!
PPS : Everybody has some bucks for reconstruction - I guess![]()
This is a free land so you are allowed to give each buck to the poor!I would be real surprised if the building was NOT insured. So, no, no money to the Pope from me. I am also sure the Catholic Church could pay for this if it were not insured.
I would be real surprised if the building was NOT insured. So, no, no money to the Pope from me. I am also sure the Catholic Church could pay for this if it were not insured.
I have no idea If the cathedral is insured or not nor do I know for definite whether the state or the Catholic Church owns it although it does sound as if the state owns it. However your second sentence does tend to "personalise" the thread into a for and against the Pope which is a great pity.I would be real surprised if the building was NOT insured. So, no, no money to the Pope from me. I am also sure the Catholic Church could pay for this if it were not insured.
My opinion! Rebuild it first, fight over who pays for it later. It represents more than just religion, it shows what humans were capable of before modern construction techniques. I have always been impressed with the engineering that went into the buildings at the time. The "Dom" in Cologne is another example and there are more elsewhere in Europe. Most were spared from destruction during World Wars 1 and 2 by people who could have destroyed each in minutes but had better sense. And I can argue "for" and "against" religions but have found it a waste of time......Regards!I have no idea If the cathedral is insured or not nor do I know for definite whether the state or the Catholic Church owns it although it does sound as if the state owns it. However your second sentence does tend to "personalise" the thread into a for and against the Pope which is a great pity.
pentaxuser - a 24 carat atheist
brilliant!
This is really great!
Here (from point of Catholic Church) you became right C Jensen!I would be real surprised if the building was NOT insured. So, no, no money to the Pope from me. I am also sure the Catholic Church could pay for this if it were not insured.
That is a real great nightshot - I made some simular but mine had problems from contrast via printing
BTW is this shot in 100% symetry? I often like such symetric framing! You did it also in a good way (from my point)!
Pentaxuser, actually I cheated and the tone is a Photoshop creation. I found the original unpleasing so I warmed up the tone using Adobe Camera Raw. I grew up with large Etchings of Rouen and Bristol Cathedrals in our house done by a great uncle. I wanted to try to replicate the tonal effect of those works from the early twentieth century.Some great shots here.
BainDarret, may I ask if your shot is a scan of a print and if so what paper and developer. It has a warm tone to it that I find particularly pleasing. It may of course be a scan of a neg or a fairly neutral coloured print but the scanner has imparted this tone
Thanks
pentaxuser
This is really great!
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |