Post Your Interior Architectural Photographs here

Abermaw woods

A
Abermaw woods

  • 1
  • 0
  • 20
Pomegranate

A
Pomegranate

  • 5
  • 2
  • 63
The Long Walk

H
The Long Walk

  • 1
  • 0
  • 99
Trellis in garden

H
Trellis in garden

  • 0
  • 1
  • 65
Giant Witness Tree

H
Giant Witness Tree

  • 0
  • 0
  • 74

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,511
Messages
2,760,325
Members
99,391
Latest member
merveet
Recent bookmarks
0

awty

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 24, 2016
Messages
3,638
Location
Australia
Format
Multi Format
Another great image. I don't comment on all the ones I like of yours, but it's a lot.
Thanks Stephen, like wise.
Your cathedrals all look brightly lit, is the the way they are? Ours are always dark and dingy, probably trying not to cook the congregants.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
2,603
Location
Los Angeles
Format
4x5 Format
Thanks Stephen, like wise.
Your cathedrals all look brightly lit, is the the way they are? Ours are always dark and dingy, probably trying not to cook the congregants.

I think in the case of Winchester from the quire section is that it's relative. The quire is darker than the nave in front of the screen and it's enclosed by dark wood panels. Bring the quire up using a long exposure lightened the nave ceiling, which is how I wanted it. They say gothic cathedrals are supposed to be all about the light.

Winchester Cathedral 3c.jpg
 
Last edited:

Moose22

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2021
Messages
1,158
Location
The Internet
Format
Medium Format
I think in the case of Winchester from the quire section is that it's relative. The quire is darker than the nave in front of the screen and it's enclosed by dark wood panels. Bring the quire up using a long exposure lightened the nave ceiling, which is how I wanted it. They say gothic cathedrals are supposed to be all about the light.

View attachment 279934

I can see that. You seem to capture light and details that are easy to miss if you don't look up and wait a bit. You kind of peek into the shadows for us a bit, too.

I like all of your cathedrals. This one is interesting, the previous one with the juxtaposition of the white stone an the paneling is a really good study in light.

Since I'm commenting, my favorite of the thread so far is the Wells Cathedral, England one. The arch into the other arch draws my eye, upper right to lower left (opposite of normal) and there's something to find in the details each step of the way.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
2,603
Location
Los Angeles
Format
4x5 Format
Since I'm commenting, my favorite of the thread so far is the Wells Cathedral, England one. The arch into the other arch draws my eye, upper right to lower left (opposite of normal) and there's something to find in the details each step of the way.

I just thought it looked cool. :smile: Seriously, I appreciate the analysis.
 

pentaxpete

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
633
Location
Brentwood, England
Format
Multi Format
Visit to Canterbury Cathedral KENT, England with members of Brentwood & District Photographic Club. Canon EOS300v + Ilford XP2400 Super. PRINTS on Kentmere VC Select Glossy in home-made Ilford PQ Universal Formula 1+9
Canterbury 05.jpg
Canterbury 07.jpg
Canterbury 08.jpg
 

Moose22

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2021
Messages
1,158
Location
The Internet
Format
Medium Format
I just thought it looked cool. :smile: Seriously, I appreciate the analysis.

That's the thing, it does "just look cool."

But I kept going back to it. Enough I kind of wanted to think about why. I've been playing with composition this past year, so maybe that's the reason I get a little wrapped up in whys, but I do.

Generally I appreciate the work you're sharing. Makes me want to go back to some places I visited over the years and think about my exposures more. Looking at some of what I have online I did try to get some different angles some places:
apse1.jpg
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2005
Messages
2,603
Location
Los Angeles
Format
4x5 Format
That's the thing, it does "just look cool."

But I kept going back to it. Enough I kind of wanted to think about why. I've been playing with composition this past year, so maybe that's the reason I get a little wrapped up in whys, but I do.

Generally I appreciate the work you're sharing. Makes me want to go back to some places I visited over the years and think about my exposures more. Looking at some of what I have online I did try to get some different angles some places:
apse1.jpg

It's definitely a good idea to frequent a place as much as possible. I believe it takes multiple visits to get past responding to the obvious. Edward Weston's insight into Point Lobos and Ansel Adams' with Yosemite happen because they lived close and within the places. Frederick Evans would explore a place for a week or so before pulling out his camera. Weston's famous pepper is numbered 31 after all.

I had just started working on a series exploring Great Britain's Neolithic and Christian constructions when my financial situation changed. Which stuck me in the intro stage. I wonder what would happen if I lived in a city with a cathedral. Would I spend a lifetime photographing it or would it become too familiar and uninspiring after a few months? I used to shoot Mono Lake three to five times a year but haven't been there in years (not that it is super close).

FYI, my avatar is of the ceiling of Peterborough Cathedral.
 
Last edited:

Moose22

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2021
Messages
1,158
Location
The Internet
Format
Medium Format
It's definitely a good idea to frequent a place as much as possible. I believe it takes multiple visits to get past responding to the obvious..

I don't disagree. And some shots I took -- like a night series I did at Sacre Coeur -- but have lost I would like to re-do. Not just because I don't have the RAWs anymore, becuse I'd do them differently now. But Paris is a long way away from California.

But there's a limit for me. I get bored with the same shot. I shouldn't, because MOST of what I started doing last year, and the first few months of film work starting in Nov, has been landscape. Every sunset is different, every sunrise, every cloudy day, every time of year has different light. But I worry I'm not leaning if I'm not trying a new thing, so once I've taken a good shot from one vantage, I seek out something else to look at.

I think I'm also worried that people will fin my work repetitive. Which is funny, because "People" who see my work mostly consist of the place where I get my prints made (I don't have a darkroom).

You've made me think some, though. The place I buy coffee beans is in an old train station building. Wood everywhere, multi story, lots of crap on the walls, lots of clutter. I haven't taken a photo there in a few years though. I am going to try and get something different next time I'm getting coffee.

Peterborough Cathedral, Cambridgeshire, England

View attachment 280599

This is just fascinating to look at. The detail is incredible.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,967
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I too like it, but I have an overwhelming desire to crop it slightly!
I know, it is a character flaw!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom