Hmm, am I reading correct that I should've provided details on film/camera used? What for? There are nearly countless instances of the same body and lens being sold and used today. Tool is irrelevant, data is just data. It's the human being in question, not the camera. Or am I strongly misreading/misunderstanding?I believe Sirius Glass amended the theme of the thread to include details.
Hmm, am I reading correct that I should've provided details on film/camera used? What for? There are nearly countless instances of the same body and lens being sold and used today. Tool is irrelevant, data is just data. It's the human being in question, not the camera. Or am I strongly misreading/misunderstanding?
Hmm, am I reading correct that I should've provided details on film/camera used? What for? There are nearly countless instances of the same body and lens being sold and used today. Tool is irrelevant, data is just data. It's the human being in question, not the camera. Or am I strongly misreading/misunderstanding?
You're strongly misreading/misunderstanding. "include details" in this case means that taking photos of parts of objects (i.e. "details") is within the theme introduced by the thread starter.
If asked, I would title this "Everyone is a critic".
Lots of fine images! A few are little more than literal illustrations, but that's not important.
"It is the journey, not the destination."
Fascinating
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?