Positive developers - experience

Diner

A
Diner

  • 3
  • 0
  • 66
Gulf Nonox

A
Gulf Nonox

  • 9
  • 3
  • 84
Druidstone

A
Druidstone

  • 8
  • 3
  • 119
On The Mound.

A
On The Mound.

  • 1
  • 0
  • 69
Ancient Camphor

D
Ancient Camphor

  • 6
  • 1
  • 79

Forum statistics

Threads
197,806
Messages
2,764,778
Members
99,480
Latest member
815 Photo
Recent bookmarks
0

Dietmar Wolf

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
633
Location
switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Hello.

Today, I developed my first time with dektol. It is really amazing what a print developer can change in quality and tone. I am very happy.

My question: I read that Ansco-130 should be even a bit better and has a longer life. Is similar available to buy or do I have to mix it myself?

Second: What about Formulary 130 or BW-65 developer from photoformulary.com Does anyone have experience and can recommend it, especially in regards to dektol (quality and life)?

(I dont want to buy Amidol)

Thank you very much, Dietmar
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,238
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
What are you using a positive developer for ? Do you mean print developer ?

The conventional meaning of a positive developer is for film/lantern slides for projection to differentiate from a negative developer. I guess you mean print developer, and yes the choice of developer can make a huge difference to the tonal range and image colour.

Ian
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,238
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
I am so sorry. Translation error. Print developer is of course right. Could any admin change the title? Thanks!

Dietmar, I guess you realised I wasn't being critical of your English, it's just if you come across a Positive developer formula in a book or manual it's usually for cine-film positives, or B&W slides and in older books lantern slides.

Of course a print is a positive, but convention is to call the developer a Print developer.

Ian
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Just FYI, to add further to the confusion there is such a thing as a positive developer or a direct positive developer.

There are Reversal F and reversal P materials which were once sold by Kodak among others. They used either an incorporated chemical or a developer that contained a reversing agent. The developers with the reversing agent were positive developers.

In addition, some monobaths used with a donor and reciever used what is called a positive developer, as the result was a direct positive image similar to that produced by Polaroid.

So, there is a lot of confusion out there about this type of nomenclature in English.

PE
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom