Pose with hand inserted in coat

West coast Vancouver Island

D
West coast Vancouver Island

  • 0
  • 0
  • 27
Under the Pier

H
Under the Pier

  • 0
  • 0
  • 33
evancanoe.JPG

A
evancanoe.JPG

  • 4
  • 0
  • 74
Ilya

A
Ilya

  • 3
  • 1
  • 75

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,681
Messages
2,762,860
Members
99,439
Latest member
May68
Recent bookmarks
0

BetterSense

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2008
Messages
3,151
Location
North Caroli
Format
35mm
http://www.mikelynaugh.com/VirtualCivilWar/New/Originals2/pages/Anderson.html

The above image is from the Civil war. That site has many interesting images from the civil war, probably wet plates?

Anyway, the pose--with the hand inserted into the partially unbuttoned coat--I have seen that in lots of old pictures. What's the explanation? Did people put their hand in their coat like that as a matter of course and the photographs just reflect a popular pose, such as a pose with the hands in the pockets?
 

Denis K

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2009
Messages
237
Format
35mm
Similar to the question of why some tuck their tie in between the buttons on their shirt. Some say this is the proper dress for certain military situations, but even so, the question is how did these styles and poses get started.
 

Anscojohn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
2,704
Format
Medium Format
First google result for: hand in coat pose
http://www.napoleon-series.org/faq/c_hand.html
*******
All that artistic tradition notwithstanding, we APUGers know the REAL reason:
those gents were actually photographing the photographer. They are reaching in to trip the shutter on their waistcoat-button, cravat- knot, or stick-pin hidden- cameras, dontchaknow! (wink).
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,281
Format
Multi Format
*******
All that artistic tradition notwithstanding, we APUGers know the REAL reason:
those gents were actually photographing the photographer. They are reaching in to trip the shutter on their waistcoat-button, cravat- knot, or stick-pin hidden- cameras, dontchaknow! (wink).
Actually they were all garment QC people, checking button spacing and stitching quality.

Lee
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,055
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
It probably makes it easier to hold still for the (in modern terms) long time exposure.

Matt
 

PeteZ8

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2008
Messages
408
Location
Newtown, PA
Format
Medium Format
The clear answer is, obviously, that these photographs were done by early paparazzi. The hand was placed inside the coat because, due to the proper decorum of the time, publicly displaying a middle finger would have been a huge socail faux pas for the subject.
 

Lee L

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
3,281
Format
Multi Format
Early form of 'texting' using morse code and a miniature telegraph key hidden in vest pocket.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,184
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
They had GAS and could not get relief because computers, KEH and eBay did not exist.

Steve
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2006
Messages
2,349
Location
Merimbula NSW Australia
Format
Multi Format
Not bad Pete, but the real reason is the high bean diet in the military in those days. His hand is firmly on his abdomen, explains the pained expression as well.
 

Dan Henderson

Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2005
Messages
1,880
Location
Blue Ridge,
Format
4x5 Format
First google result for: hand in coat pose
http://www.napoleon-series.org/faq/c_hand.html

According this source, "In real life," Miller observes, "the 'hand-held-in' was a common stance for men of breeding."

Sort of like how current "men of breeding" (or those wishing to appear so) walk around with the collars of their polo shirts turned up or with sweaters draped over their shoulders.
 

BobNewYork

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
1,067
Location
Long Island,
Format
Medium Format
Portraits of Napoleon and Nelson etc showed the same pose. My understanding was that, until the advent of the sewing machine, one was obliged to hold up one's trousers. The hand in the jacket, (and remember "low-risers" or "hipsters" had yet to become fashionable) was essential in order to distinguish early portraiture from early pornography. Lord Admiral Nelson, apparently very much annoyed by this pose requirement is reputed to have said to the artist: "All this fuss over a little thing like that !" :D:D

Bob H
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,950
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
Nelson and Napoleon were both men of very small stature about 5' 4" putting their hands in their coats made them look bigger and more important and impressive.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom