Poor highlight contrast

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 6
  • 6
  • 107
Couples

A
Couples

  • 4
  • 0
  • 90
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 6
  • 4
  • 131
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 7
  • 2
  • 142

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,054
Messages
2,785,448
Members
99,791
Latest member
nsoll
Recent bookmarks
1

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Also Via Google ----

How dangerous is this ferricyanide bleaching business?

Those with sulfuric or other strong acids hanging around are
warned not to mix the two. Quit safe; part of every Kodak
Sepia kit. It's the bleach. The latent image bleach is used
one- shot. It is used EXTREMELY dilute. Ten grams from
P. Formulary will make about 100 liters of a stronger
dilution or 1000 liters of the weaker dilution.

Also via Google search for, "variable contrast from graded
papers" . I don't recall the method being exclusively for
graded papers. I'd think it would also work with
VC papers. Dan
 
OP
OP
polyglot

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
I finally made it into the darkroom and figured out my preflash: 1/3s f/22 full-height on the spare enlarger. 1/2s gave the tiniest bit of tone after drydown but 1/3s was clear. Also discovered the club's safelights aren't very.

I found that preflash has a visible effect but the reverse of what I wanted! I only tried it with white/unfiltered light from an enlarger and didn't get around to preflashing magenta.

It seems that if I preflash, I can get detail in the highlights at a higher print grade but the contrast index in the highlights is lower. In other words, it seems to roll the curve off at the highlight end, which is what you'd expect given that you're adding a bunch of non-image light. In the highlights, the image is largely made up of preflash (and without preflash they'd be blank) whereas in the shadows, the preflash has a very small contribution to the exposure. Say I have a scene I could fit into the paper's dynamic range at grade 2 (but it looks flat) or at grade 3 and lose the highlights; with preflashing I can print it at grade 3, get more CI in the shadows and still hold detail in the highlights, but the highlights will be closer to grade 1.5. So it's definitely a useful technique that I will be exploring heavily with some high-key photos. I think it should also be good for reducing grain in skies and I have an image I think it will work wonders on next week for that purpose.

I tried printing with less-yellow light (120Y instead of 200Y) for the low-contrast part; it made no difference. I think that's a function of how my colour head works - say I wind in 100Y, the position of the dichroic filter means that blue is blocked from 1/2 of the flux from the bulb. So I seem to get exactly the same image whether I use (say) 10s of 200M and 4s of 200Y as if I used 8s of 200M and 4s of 100Y. If I was using discrete filters in a B&W head, this approach (say, print with 1 and 4 not 00 and 5) may well be valuable, I don't know.

I also tried yellow-first split-grade but found that I got results much flatter than I wanted. Typical exposures I'm using without preflash are between 4:1 and 8:1 M:Y, so by the time I have visible tone from yellow exposure, there's way too much of it. Might be I'm doing wrong, I dunno - I've only been printing for about 6mo. I think I might just need to pay more attention to drydown. And I think I'm definitely getting shoulder effects in some of my shots, so I'll need to pay a bit more attention there - seems particularly problematic when pulling Pan-F.

Thanks for all the suggestions, they're appreciated. If I had a flatbed scanner I'd post the results, but my only digitisers are a DSLR and film scanner.
 
OP
OP
polyglot

polyglot

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2009
Messages
3,467
Location
South Australia
Format
Medium Format
Further experimentation tells me that it's not the printing, it's the negatives. I did a portrait session for a friend: some HP5 and some Acros. The HP5 has printed beautifully and has lovely sparkling highlights. The Acros looks dead and flat even when printed across the full paper range at a too-high grade - it manages to look flat and overly-contrasty at the same time :sad:

My current hypothesis is that I'm getting developer exhaustion in the highlights (using Rodinal 1+100 for 18 mins, agitation as per MDC) so I'm going to try some more Acros in D76 again (as I recall, that worked well for me in the past).

I really don't want to give up Acros because it's so very fine-grained. HP5 just gets crunchy when printed large; while it looks great from a distance, I like having big, finely-detailed prints you can get your nose lost in.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom