Polypan F issues

[StoneNYC]

I didn't say it was cheap, but David just asked for a reliable link for a source for bulk film, and that's what I posted.

all filmphotographyproject films are ludicrously overpriced.

A 400 roll of Double-X is $180, they are selling 100 feet for $80.... That's double the price! Outrageous!

 

[georg16nik]

A 400 roll of Double-X is $180, they are selling 100 feet for $80.... That's double the price! Outrageous!

some folks in US are trying to milk the cow, selling polypan f way above the european price.
nothing outrageous about facing up to the american dream - the folks wants you buying double-x.

ain't polypan f issue

 

[Xmas]

A 400 roll of Double-X is $180, they are selling 100 feet for $80.... That's double the price! Outrageous!

but it is the price for a 150 metre can of film.
$80 for 152M (nearly 500 feet) is very cheap indeed surely?

Some people may have missed the 2nd quote?
But at 80 USD for 500 foot it is not a replacement for 5222 or Orwo cine which are both premium negative films. It would need to be a lot cheaper?
Jolly unfair for the frogs to invent their own measures and currency?

 

[StoneNYC]

Some people may have missed the 2nd quote?
But at 80 USD for 500 foot it is not a replacement for 5222 or Orwo cine which are both premium negative films. It would need to be a lot cheaper?
Jolly unfair for the frogs to invent their own measures and currency?

Huh? Just looked at the sight again, it's $80 for 100 feet of polypanf also, no mention of Meters.

 

[Xmas]

Huh? Just looked at the sight again, it's $80 for 100 feet of polypanf also, no mention of Meters.

Hi Stone

Sorry thanks you are correct but it must be a mistake?
It will 'never' sell more expensive than factory bulk Ilford or kodak...
The euroland price is 56eu for 150m which may fit into a 100 foot bulk loader cause it is PET, donno. I thought 56 was expensive for 150m of poly. The Agfa APS400S I use was 5GBP for 68m and is prehardened still using it.
The other site is respooling 5222 (Double-X) and polypan but is not using the same markup for this service, oops. Cheaper getting 400 foot of 5222: easy to respool in gbag. If I can do that you could: note Im handicapped.
5222 is the pinnacle of Kodak's non tabular process.

http://www.lumiere-shop.de/index.php?page=categorie&cat=79

 

[StoneNYC]

Hi Stone

Sorry thanks you are correct but it must be a mistake?
It will 'never' sell more expensive than factory bulk Ilford or kodak...
The euroland price is 56eu for 150m which may fit into a 100 foot bulk loader cause it is PET, donno. I thought 56 was expensive for 150m of poly. The Agfa APS400S I use was 5GBP for 68m and is prehardened still using it.
The other site is respooling 5222 (Double-X) and polypan but is not using the same markup for this service, oops. Cheaper getting 400 foot of 5222: easy to respool in gbag. If I can do that you could: note Im handicapped.
5222 is the pinnacle of Kodak's non tabular process.

http://www.lumiere-shop.de/index.php?page=categorie&cat=79

We agree on something.

Did you buy into the special Double-X 4x5 sheet order? I know the price was higher than expected but we are close to an order, less than 10 orders left needed for kodak to start cutting.

 

[Xmas]

We agree on something.

Did you buy into the special Double-X 4x5 sheet order? I know the price was higher than expected but we are close to an order, less than 10 orders left needed for kodak to start cutting.

We only disagree on knocking on tanks?
But I don't have a 4x5 camera...

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandra_Samusenko

The Soviet tankers got in real close at Krusk where Alexsandras long 75 would have done more than knock.

 

[StoneNYC]

We only disagree on knocking on tanks?
But I don't have a 4x5 camera...

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandra_Samusenko

The Soviet tankers got in real close at Krusk where Alexsandras long 75 would have done more than knock.

Such a friendly happy smile for someone good at blowing things up.

 

[David Lyga]

I have not found anything hinting at a minimum order or shipping costs of 60$€. To the contrary, they state to bill the actual shipping costs. (In times with no more surface parcels that might be high though...)

On their website under the link for 'shipping and returns' it gives shipping for different countries. For example, domestically, Germany is 4.99 euros. For the USA it is 46.7 euros. That is about USD 60. Orders over 10,000 euros (!) are free. - David Lyga

 

[Arctic amateur]

I agree, that is rather expensive. On the other hand, B&H charges $43 to send a roll of Tri-X to Germany. Cross-Atlantic shipping can be costly if you don't optimize for it, like Freestyle have done and B&H and Lumiere haven't.

 

[AgX]

On their website under the link for 'shipping and returns' it gives shipping for different countries.

You are right. I looked intensively over their side, glanced over their legal terms, but did not realize their shipping costs were to be estimated after those terms, and I rather thought they would have to be called for. A bad place to put them, at least for people like me.

 

[Arctic amateur]

all filmphotographyproject films are ludicrously overpriced.

Sourcing and bulk-loading all those uncommon films will be a fair bit of work. They sell regular films at perfectly reasonable prices.

If I want to try some of their strange films my options are either to buy a roll or three from FPP or Labeuratoire and pay their markup, or I can buy a bulk roll if that is economically and practically possible. Then if I don't like the film I have an expensive opened bulk roll.

 

[pdeeh]

By my standards, whatever work they are doing, they are ludicrously overpriced for what they are selling.

 

[q_x]

Using bulk film is simply a choice made between 50m of film in cassettes or 150m in a can.

 

[Arctic amateur]

By my standards, whatever work they are doing, they are ludicrously overpriced for what they are selling.

What's a fair price, in your opinion?

 

[pdeeh]

For what?
It's not relevant what I consider to be a fair price for anything, whether it's film sold by filmphotographyproject or any other product sold by anyone else.
I won't buy from them, but I have no axe to grind.
If you think their prices are fair, and are happy to pay them, that's fine.

 

[David Lyga]

NOTE TO ALL:

Three days ago I emailed this Lumiere company with questions about the film. They have YET to respond.

Places like the film photography project (I am not singling them out here) simply try to find a niche where prices are low abroad and then try to sell for FULL US anticipated price for similar film. Wall Street calls this tactic 'arbitrage'. In summation, getting it 'cheap', when all is said and done, will not happen. - David Lyga


NOTA BENE UPDATE: see below for an example of how short-sighted David Lyga is capable of being.

 

[pdeeh]

the front page of the Lumiere site does say clearly that they are closed from 14th Jan to 27th January, Perhaps that is why they aren't replying ...

 

[David Lyga]

pdeeh, how I hate, really hate, when I am proved wrong. 'You take the cake' today for calling my bluff. Thank you. - David LYga

 

[Xmas]

What's a fair price, in your opinion?

Difficult they are shipping 150m packed from a distributor in Germany and splitting it into 30m spools or cores.

So there is postage time and packaging.

If you are using a bulk loader or a dark room you can do the respool your self winding 30m takes about 45 minutes!

Because it is PET base you might get 60m or so on a cine spool (which came with Fugi or Agfa bulk film) when you fill the spool drop it into bulk loader (or spool cans if you are doing all 150m at one sitting & tape up cans.) You can buy spools and cans on eBay.

So order from Germany is best but you can do sums for trade offs with your postal costs.

But 400 foot of 5222 (double-x) or a short end may/will be cheaper and double-x is Kodak's nicest film ISO 250 in D76 grain little larger than Plus-x but non tabular. Soup in Microphen at ISO 320 20C 7 mins for low contrast.

The only snag with 5222 is it is thick base for cine cams and 33 frames is safer than 36 with some types of cassettes.

There are large numbers using 5222.

Poly pan is horrible YMMV of course light pipes, burns highlights and needs care in processing.

 

[Arctic amateur]

For what?
It's not relevant what I consider to be a fair price for anything, whether it's film sold by filmphotographyproject or any other product sold by anyone else.
I won't buy from them, but I have no axe to grind.
If you think their prices are fair, and are happy to pay them, that's fine.

You stated that you think they are overpriced. At what price point would they, in your opinion, not be overpriced?

 

[Arctic amateur]

Huh? Just looked at the sight again, it's $80 for 100 feet of polypanf also, no mention of Meters.

They've dropped the price to $40 for 100ft of Polypan F.

 

[NB23]

The worst film ever made. Why do people use that sheet when Kodak snd Ilford offer the BEST there is?

I remember having 1000 feet of that stuff. One day, in disgust, I opened the cans in broad daylight and felt totally liberated. Felt as relieved as when I throw stinky garbage in the bin.

True story.

 

[AgX]

Why do people eat "junk food" if there is a "award-winning" restaurant?

 

[Xmas]

depends how poor you are and there is a different signature.

I take photos of hobos inventoring garbage containers...