Polaroid for a teenager

Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 0
  • 0
  • 11
Horizon, summer rain

D
Horizon, summer rain

  • 0
  • 0
  • 14
$12.66

A
$12.66

  • 6
  • 3
  • 145
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 161
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 2
  • 2
  • 150

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,813
Messages
2,781,174
Members
99,710
Latest member
LibbyPScott
Recent bookmarks
0

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
Another +1 for the instax system. Sharp, contrasty, beautiful film, the likes of which you won't find from impossible any time soon if ever, and cleaner and easier than pack film. The film is comparatively affordable too.

Then how come they won't make a check ing back for film cameras like a 120 RZ / Hasslwbla back? Isn't it almost 120 sized?


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
Instax film, be it the mini size or wide is amazingly sharp film with very little grain for an ISO800 film. Highly, highly recommended over any Polaroid equivalent.
 

himself

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Messages
513
Format
Multi Format
the cheapest most reliable and I guess safest would definitely be the instax as most have said.

but if you'd rather get a Polaroid and go for the TIP, then you could get a polaroid 3000RF instead of an sx-70.
it's an all plastic body with rangefinder, rather than zone or fixed focus like the other plastic body polaroids.
it also uses integral film (100, not 600) so would work with TIP film.

you can usually get them for under $30.

if you'd like, I have one I can send over to you, just pm me.
 

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
the cheapest most reliable and I guess safest would definitely be the instax as most have said.

but if you'd rather get a Polaroid and go for the TIP, then you could get a polaroid 3000RF instead of an sx-70.
it's an all plastic body with rangefinder, rather than zone or fixed focus like the other plastic body polaroids.
it also uses integral film (100, not 600) so would work with TIP film.

you can usually get them for under $30.

if you'd like, I have one I can send over to you, just pm me.

I think you meant "600 NOT 100" :smile: but nice of you. Yay for APUG givers :smile:


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP

Matus Kalisky

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
630
Location
Aalen, Germa
Format
Multi Format
OK, the decision was taken (at presence of mother of my niece!). It is going to be SX-70 (or some of its variations - I need to look more into that) + TIP films. The very central reason is that the TIP films allow for alterations during development and that is what attract my niece most (she really has a crash on photography since about 6 months). The uncle will support the young artist with a couple of boxes of TIP film and a usable camera.

So - now I am out looking for a working SX-70 (and needing to lear more about it - there are several clones as far as I know).

EDIT: I do not seem to find any reasonable compilation on different SX-70. I would appreciate your help on which models are worth having a look at.

I should probably add; as the camera will be pretty much a present from me, but for technical reason will only be delivered in March, I will have a little time to use it too :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

cepwin

Member
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
336
Format
35mm
Excellent choice....I'm sure she'll love it. The web site I mentioned has two available for $90us that were tested and verified operational. However, they're not the classic original SX-70 (we had one growing up) that I think is a better camera if you can find one in good working order. The ones they have are the one step type which don't give you as much control. Good luck!
 

himself

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Messages
513
Format
Multi Format
Dead Link Removed
except that that the SLR 680/690 are the same type as the sx-70 but use the 600 type film not the sx-70 types, well, that info is on there, but in a different section.
 

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
nope meant that it takes the sx-70 film which is asa 100 (no?), sorry if that wasn't clear

I thought you were saying "type 100" which is pack film/peel apart. Thus the misunderstanding :smile:

All clear now


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
Dead Link Removed
except that that the SLR 680/690 are the same type as the sx-70 but use the 600 type film not the sx-70 types, well, that info is on there, but in a different section.

That's helpful! Apparently I have the sonar :smile: yay!

Also the flash bars don't really exist anymore, you can get the TIP flash which is NOT a one time flash bar but a permanent reusable one, thank goodness!! It's expensive but probably worth considering.

Also be warned, she's 6 months into photography and you are waiting 3-ish months to give her this camera? Remember how quickly you moved onto the next toy at her age? Perhaps a camera NOW and more film and flash for May (or whatever month you had planned on). Just a suggestion.


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 

himself

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Messages
513
Format
Multi Format
Stone's suggestion is good about maybe camera now and film later, unless you hope she moves on and you get to keep the cam :wink:

Stone,

The cubes seem to crop up on ebay every now and again. I have one of the flash gun types in my attic, not sure of the model, but I can take a look if either of you are interested. without looking I can say it works with my sonar, so imagine it would work with most others too.
 

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
Stone's suggestion is good about maybe camera now and film later, unless you hope she moves on and you get to keep the cam :wink:

Stone,

The cubes seem to crop up on ebay every now and again. I have one of the flash gun types in my attic, not sure of the model, but I can take a look if either of you are interested. without looking I can say it works with my sonar, so imagine it would work with most others too.

Haha :wink:

The flashes can be had but not reliably and it's just easier to buy a flash once.


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Dead Link Removed
except that that the SLR 680/690 are the same type as the sx-70 but use the 600 type film not the sx-70 types, well, that info is on there, but in a different section.

Here is the SX-70 section of an alternative lay-out of that Land-List:


http://www.instantoptions.com/landlist/cameras/sx70/

I find it more clear than the original, though the types 680/690 are not registered under SX-70 (I never came across them anyway...)
 

Prof_Pixel

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
1,917
Location
Penfield, NY
Format
35mm
I realize that teenagers frequently go through 'retro' phases, but you really should ask yourself just how much money you should put into this 'phase'. Yes, TIP film is digitally manipulatable (digital=finger), but there are other ways of achieving similar manipulation (DPUG material). If you want to promote an interest in film photography, why not a film camera that's 'retro' like a Holga?
 

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
So - a nice (tested) SX-70 should arrive in a few days as well as 5 (do not tell my wife :whistling:) boxes of PX-70 Color Protection.

It's playtime. Once I have my fun the camera will be passed to my niece :tongue:

You might not give it up lol


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP

Matus Kalisky

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
630
Location
Aalen, Germa
Format
Multi Format
So the camera arrived - as seller said it is indeed in good working condition, but the rollers were really dirty on sides and so first two shots had undeveloped parts in the top part of the image. But after I cleaned them this problem is gone. Now I have to try to get a sharp image. I did one more today, but it seems that amount of light in the room was not enough, so it got motion blur.

The camera is quite compact when folded in spite of the fact that it has a HUGE fun factor attached :smile:

It is a pity though that the Impossible film (their latest PX-70 color protection) takes about 30 minutes to fully develop (and you do not see anything first 10 minutes). If I were to keep the camera I would check the BW film options.

I will post some results once I get something worthwhile.
 

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
Also sometimes they are under developed so you have to put the dark/light adjustment to light, that helps sometimes.

Good luck! I've moved on to spectra haha


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP

Matus Kalisky

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2006
Messages
630
Location
Aalen, Germa
Format
Multi Format
S - after few bad images (handshake, dirty rollers) I managed to get something better looking:





I used tripod for both images as I realized that the film has ISO 125 and as the lens is slow (f/8 if I am not mistaken) it is more of an 'outdoor' camera. But the photos really do have charm. I have actually one more, but the model did not want to sign the release :laugh:

EDIT: I do not have a scanner, so a P&S had to do what caused some reflections as the photos are glossy.
 

Attachments

  • 8418984291_e98d6c90e0.jpg
    8418984291_e98d6c90e0.jpg
    156.9 KB · Views: 100

StoneNYC

Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
8,345
Location
Antarctica
Format
8x10 Format
S - after few bad images (handshake, dirty rollers) I managed to get something better looking:





I used tripod for both images as I realized that the film has ISO 125 and as the lens is slow (f/8 if I am not mistaken) it is more of an 'outdoor' camera. But the photos really do have charm. I have actually one more, but the model did not want to sign the release :laugh:

EDIT: I do not have a scanner, so a P&S had to do what caused some reflections as the photos are glossy.

Wow really great exposure!! I'm shocked that's the SX-70? I need to get mine fixed the one that works is the auto and it stinks.

These are great


~Stone

Mamiya: 7 II, RZ67 Pro II / Canon: 1V, AE-1, 5DmkII / Kodak: No 1 Pocket Autographic, No 1A Pocket Autographic | Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom